| Message ID | 1501748620-42866-5-git-send-email-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
Às 9:23 AM de 8/3/2017, Zhiqiang Hou escreveu: > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > host_init function. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > --- > V2: > - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate class code > fixup code from this patch. > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > return 1; > } > > -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > -{ > - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > - struct device *dev = pci->dev; > - u32 index[2]; > - > - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > - return; > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > - return; > - } > - pcie->index = index[1]; > - > - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > - > - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > -} > - > static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > { > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > + > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > +} > + > +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > + struct device *dev = pci->dev; > + u32 index[2]; > + > + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > + return; > + } > + > + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > + return; > + } > + pcie->index = index[1]; > + > + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); > } > > static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, > Reviewed-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
Hi Joao, Thanks a lot for your reveiw! > -----Original Message----- > From: Joao Pinto [mailto:Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com] > Sent: 2017年8月8日 21:14 > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > bhelgaas@google.com; jingoohan1@gmail.com; Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com > Cc: M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; > Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/6] PCI: layerscape: refactor the host_init function > > Às 9:23 AM de 8/3/2017, Zhiqiang Hou escreveu: > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > > host_init function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > --- > > V2: > > - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate > class code > > fixup code from this patch. > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 > > ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > return 1; > > } > > > > -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) -{ > > - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > - struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > - u32 index[2]; > > - > > - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > - return; > > - } > > - > > - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > - return; > > - } > > - pcie->index = index[1]; > > - > > - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > - > > - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > -} > > - > > static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) { > > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ static > > void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > > > ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > + > > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > +} > > + > > +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) { > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > + struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > + u32 index[2]; > > + > > + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + pcie->index = index[1]; > > + > > + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); > > } > > > > static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, > > > > Reviewed-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com> - Zhiqiang
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:23:38PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > host_init function. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > --- > V2: > - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate class code > fixup code from this patch. > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > return 1; > } > > -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > -{ > - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > - struct device *dev = pci->dev; > - u32 index[2]; > - > - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > - return; > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > - return; > - } > - pcie->index = index[1]; > - > - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > - > - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > -} > - > static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > { > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > + > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > +} > + > +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > + struct device *dev = pci->dev; > + u32 index[2]; > + > + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > + return; > + } > + > + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > + return; > + } > + pcie->index = index[1]; > + > + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); The changelog suggests that this is a simple refactoring that doesn't fix anything. But because ls1021_pcie_host_init() now calls ls_pcie_host_init(), it now calls: dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); ls_pcie_fix_class(pcie); ls_pcie_clear_multifunction(pcie); dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); when it did not call them before. It's fine with me if you want to do that, but it should be mentioned in the changelog. > } > > static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, > -- > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 >
[+cc Stanimir, Niklas, Jesper] On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:24PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:23:38PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > > host_init function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > --- > > V2: > > - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate class code > > fixup code from this patch. > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > return 1; > > } > > > > -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > -{ > > - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > - struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > - u32 index[2]; > > - > > - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > - return; > > - } > > - > > - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > - return; > > - } > > - pcie->index = index[1]; > > - > > - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > - > > - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > -} > > - > > static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > { > > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > > > ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > + > > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > +} > > + > > +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > +{ > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > + struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > + u32 index[2]; > > + > > + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + pcie->index = index[1]; > > + > > + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); > > The changelog suggests that this is a simple refactoring that doesn't > fix anything. > > But because ls1021_pcie_host_init() now calls ls_pcie_host_init(), it > now calls: > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); > ls_pcie_fix_class(pcie); > ls_pcie_clear_multifunction(pcie); > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > when it did not call them before. > > It's fine with me if you want to do that, but it should be mentioned > in the changelog. The order of this series is screwed up, which makes it hard to follow. 5192ec7b24dd ("PCI: layerscape: Add support for LS1043a and LS2080a") added ls_pcie_host_init(), which didn't call dw_pcie_setup_rc(). I think that was a bug, and you should fix that first. Then: - Rebase on pci/host-designware because it conflicts with patches I've already applied (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/log/?h=pci/host-designware) - Make ls_pcie_host_init() call dw_pcie_setup_rc() (fixes 5192ec7b24dd) - Refactor ls1021_pcie_host_init() to make it call ls_pcie_host_init() (this will now be no functional change) - Disable outbound ATUs in ls_pcie_host_init() (bugfix for all layerscape devices) - Add DBI write permission accessors and use them in layerscape. This will make it obvious that PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF is moving from layerscape to designware and that we're actually using these new interfaces (this will be no functional change). - Enable write permission in dw_pcie_setup_rc() and remove class code update from ls_pcie_host_init() This will make it obvious that fixing dw_pcie_setup_rc() makes ls_pcie_fix_class() obsolete. Does this dw_pcie_setup_rc() fix mean we can also get rid of the device class check in qcom_pcie_rd_own_conf()? I suspect it also means we can drop the write enable in artpec6_pcie_establish_link(). > > } > > > > static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, > > -- > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > >
Hi Bjorn, Thanks a lot for your comments! > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > Sent: 2017年8月15日 5:38 > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; > jingoohan1@gmail.com; Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com; M.h. Lian > <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy Zang > <roy.zang@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/6] PCI: layerscape: refactor the host_init function > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:23:38PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > > host_init function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > --- > > V2: > > - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate > class code > > fixup code from this patch. > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 > > ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > return 1; > > } > > > > -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) -{ > > - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > - struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > - u32 index[2]; > > - > > - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > - return; > > - } > > - > > - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > - return; > > - } > > - pcie->index = index[1]; > > - > > - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > - > > - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > -} > > - > > static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) { > > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ static > > void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > > > ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > + > > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > +} > > + > > +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) { > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > + struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > + u32 index[2]; > > + > > + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + pcie->index = index[1]; > > + > > + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); > > The changelog suggests that this is a simple refactoring that doesn't fix > anything. > > But because ls1021_pcie_host_init() now calls ls_pcie_host_init(), it now calls: > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); > ls_pcie_fix_class(pcie); > ls_pcie_clear_multifunction(pcie); > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > when it did not call them before. > > It's fine with me if you want to do that, but it should be mentioned in the > changelog. I will add these to changelog. Actually, the ls1021a use the same PCIe IP core with other Layerscape platforms, but the method to get LTSSM is implemented differently. This is the reason, I think, to separate ls1021a host init function, the reset parts of host init function should be the same. > > } > > > > static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, > > -- > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > > Thanks, Zhiqiang
Hi Bjorn, Thanks a lot for your comments! > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > Sent: 2017年8月15日 6:26 > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; > jingoohan1@gmail.com; Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com; M.h. Lian > <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy Zang > <roy.zang@nxp.com>; Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>; Niklas > Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>; Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/6] PCI: layerscape: refactor the host_init function > > [+cc Stanimir, Niklas, Jesper] > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:24PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:23:38PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > > > Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > > > host_init function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > --- > > > V2: > > > - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate > class code > > > fixup code from this patch. > > > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > > index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > > @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie > *pci) > > > return 1; > > > } > > > > > > -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) -{ > > > - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > > - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > > - struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > > - u32 index[2]; > > > - > > > - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > > - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > > - return; > > > - } > > > - > > > - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > > - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > > - pcie->scfg = NULL; > > > - return; > > > - } > > > - pcie->index = index[1]; > > > - > > > - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > > - > > > - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > > -} > > > - > > > static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) { > > > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ > > > static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > > > > > ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); > > > + > > > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > > > +} > > > + > > > +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) { > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > > + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); > > > + struct device *dev = pci->dev; > > > + u32 index[2]; > > > + > > > + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); > > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { > > > + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); > > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > > + return; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, > > > + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { > > > + pcie->scfg = NULL; > > > + return; > > > + } > > > + pcie->index = index[1]; > > > + > > > + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); > > > > The changelog suggests that this is a simple refactoring that doesn't > > fix anything. > > > > But because ls1021_pcie_host_init() now calls ls_pcie_host_init(), it > > now calls: > > > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); > > ls_pcie_fix_class(pcie); > > ls_pcie_clear_multifunction(pcie); > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > > > when it did not call them before. > > > > It's fine with me if you want to do that, but it should be mentioned > > in the changelog. > > The order of this series is screwed up, which makes it hard to follow. > > 5192ec7b24dd ("PCI: layerscape: Add support for LS1043a and LS2080a") > added ls_pcie_host_init(), which didn't call dw_pcie_setup_rc(). I think that > was a bug, and you should fix that first. Yes, it is a bug, the reason that the ls_pcie_host_init() doesn't call dw_pcie_setup_rc() is it uses the setups by u-boot, so I submitted these patches to resolve the dependency and make it robust. > Then: > > - Rebase on pci/host-designware because it conflicts with patches > I've already applied > > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/log/?h=pci/ho > st-designware) > > - Make ls_pcie_host_init() call dw_pcie_setup_rc() (fixes > 5192ec7b24dd) > > - Refactor ls1021_pcie_host_init() to make it call > ls_pcie_host_init() (this will now be no functional change) > > - Disable outbound ATUs in ls_pcie_host_init() (bugfix for all > layerscape devices) > > - Add DBI write permission accessors and use them in layerscape. > This will make it obvious that PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF is moving > from layerscape to designware and that we're actually using these > new interfaces (this will be no functional change). > > - Enable write permission in dw_pcie_setup_rc() and remove class > code update from ls_pcie_host_init() This will make it obvious > that fixing dw_pcie_setup_rc() makes ls_pcie_fix_class() obsolete. > > Does this dw_pcie_setup_rc() fix mean we can also get rid of the device class > check in qcom_pcie_rd_own_conf()? Yes, I think so. > I suspect it also means we can drop the write enable in > artpec6_pcie_establish_link(). Yes, you're right, thanks for your suggestion and I will reform these patches with this order. > > > > } > > > > > > static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, > > > -- > > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > > > Thanks, Zhiqiang
Hi Bjorn, On 08/15/2017 01:26 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Stanimir, Niklas, Jesper] > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:24PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:23:38PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: >>> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> >>> >>> Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common >>> host_init function. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> >>> --- >>> V2: >>> - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove duplicate class code >>> fixup code from this patch. >>> >>> drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c >>> index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c >>> @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) >>> return 1; >>> } >>> <cut> > > - Enable write permission in dw_pcie_setup_rc() and remove class > code update from ls_pcie_host_init() This will make it obvious > that fixing dw_pcie_setup_rc() makes ls_pcie_fix_class() obsolete. > > Does this dw_pcie_setup_rc() fix mean we can also get rid of the > device class check in qcom_pcie_rd_own_conf()? Thanks for the CC, I'll manage to test those patches and after that I'll confirm does this fixes device_class register value for qcom driver. regards, Stan
Hi Stanimir, > -----Original Message----- > From: Stanimir Varbanov [mailto:svarbanov@mm-sol.com] > Sent: 2017年8月15日 17:34 > To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>; Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; > jingoohan1@gmail.com; Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com; M.h. Lian > <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy Zang > <roy.zang@nxp.com>; Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>; Jesper Nilsson > <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/6] PCI: layerscape: refactor the host_init function > > Hi Bjorn, > > On 08/15/2017 01:26 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Stanimir, Niklas, Jesper] > > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:24PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:23:38PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > >>> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > >>> > >>> Make the ls1021a's host_init reuse layerscape platform's common > >>> host_init function. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > >>> --- > >>> V2: > >>> - Removed the disable outbound windows code and the remove > duplicate class code > >>> fixup code from this patch. > >>> > >>> drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 54 > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > >>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > >>> b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > >>> index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > >>> @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie > *pci) > >>> return 1; > >>> } > >>> > > <cut> > > > > > - Enable write permission in dw_pcie_setup_rc() and remove class > > code update from ls_pcie_host_init() This will make it obvious > > that fixing dw_pcie_setup_rc() makes ls_pcie_fix_class() obsolete. > > > > Does this dw_pcie_setup_rc() fix mean we can also get rid of the > > device class check in qcom_pcie_rd_own_conf()? > > Thanks for the CC, I'll manage to test those patches and after that I'll confirm > does this fixes device_class register value for qcom driver. I have sent out patch set v3, which include removing qcom driver's obsolete fixup, please help to test. Thanks, Zhiqiang
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c index 09056a6..3533a8c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c @@ -107,33 +107,6 @@ static int ls1021_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) return 1; } -static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) -{ - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); - struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); - struct device *dev = pci->dev; - u32 index[2]; - - pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, - "fsl,pcie-scfg"); - if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { - dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); - pcie->scfg = NULL; - return; - } - - if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, - "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { - pcie->scfg = NULL; - return; - } - pcie->index = index[1]; - - dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); - - ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); -} - static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) { struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); @@ -160,6 +133,33 @@ static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); ls_pcie_drop_msg_tlp(pcie); + + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); +} + +static void ls1021_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) +{ + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); + struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci); + struct device *dev = pci->dev; + u32 index[2]; + + pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, + "fsl,pcie-scfg"); + if (IS_ERR(pcie->scfg)) { + dev_err(dev, "No syscfg phandle specified\n"); + pcie->scfg = NULL; + return; + } + + if (of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, + "fsl,pcie-scfg", index, 2)) { + pcie->scfg = NULL; + return; + } + pcie->index = index[1]; + + ls_pcie_host_init(pp); } static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp,