diff mbox

[V12,1/5] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout

Message ID 1503464171-6471-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Delegated to: Bjorn Helgaas
Headers show

Commit Message

Sinan Kaya Aug. 23, 2017, 4:56 a.m. UTC 
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

While waiting for a device to become ready (i.e., to return a non-CRS
completion to a read of its Vendor ID), if we got a valid response to the
very last read before timing out, we printed a warning and gave up on the
device even though it was actually ready.

For a typical 60s timeout, we wait about 65s (it's not exact because of the
exponential backoff), but we treated devices that became ready between 33s
and 65s as though they failed.

Move the Device ID read later so we check whether the device is ready
immediately, before checking for a timeout.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
[okaya: reorder reads so that we check device presence after sleep]
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index c31310d..2849e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1847,17 +1847,18 @@  bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
 		if (!crs_timeout)
 			return false;
 
-		msleep(delay);
-		delay *= 2;
-		if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
-			return false;
-		/* Card hasn't responded in 60 seconds?  Must be stuck. */
 		if (delay > crs_timeout) {
 			printk(KERN_WARNING "pci %04x:%02x:%02x.%d: not responding\n",
 			       pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
 			       PCI_FUNC(devfn));
 			return false;
 		}
+
+		msleep(delay);
+		delay *= 2;
+
+		if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
+			return false;
 	}
 
 	return true;