@@ -193,16 +193,6 @@ int cpqhp_set_irq (u8 bus_num, u8 dev_num, u8 int_pin, u8 irq_num)
}
-/*
- * WTF??? This function isn't in the code, yet a function calls it, but the
- * compiler optimizes it away? strange. Here as a placeholder to keep the
- * compiler happy.
- */
-static int PCI_ScanBusNonBridge (u8 bus, u8 device)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static int PCI_ScanBusForNonBridge(struct controller *ctrl, u8 bus_num, u8 * dev_num)
{
u16 tdevice;
@@ -231,9 +221,9 @@ static int PCI_ScanBusForNonBridge(struct controller *ctrl, u8 bus_num, u8 * dev
/* Yep we got one. bridge ? */
if ((work >> 8) == PCI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE_CLASS) {
pci_bus_read_config_byte (ctrl->pci_bus, PCI_DEVFN(tdevice, 0), PCI_SECONDARY_BUS, &tbus);
+ /* XXX: no recursion, wtf? */
dbg("Recurse on bus_num %d tdevice %d\n", tbus, tdevice);
- if (PCI_ScanBusNonBridge(tbus, tdevice) == 0)
- return 0;
+ return 0;
}
}
I have no clue what the original intent here was, but the code as written is useless. The old dbg() statement above the old callsite might lead one to think that at one point, there was supposed to be some recursion, but any sense of sanity here has been lost to the ravages of time. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> --- drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c | 14 ++------------ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html