Message ID | 20180308133331.19464-5-niklas.cassel@axis.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
Hi Niklas, On Thursday 08 March 2018 07:03 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote: > In order to properly handle 64-bit BARs, we need to know what BAR width > that was actually set-up by specific pci_epc_set_bar() implementations. > > This is done so that we can know if we need to skip a BAR, > since a 64-bit BAR consists of a BAR pair. > > It is important to know the BAR width that was actually set-up, > since some drivers, like the Cadence EP controller, does not > simply look at PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64, as it configures > all BARs larger than 2G as 64-bit. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com> > --- > drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 2 +- > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 7 ++++++- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c b/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c > index 3c3a97743453..0e4cc4cca56d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int cdns_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, enum pci_barno bar, > CDNS_PCIE_LM_EP_FUNC_BAR_CFG_BAR_CTRL(b, ctrl)); > cdns_pcie_writel(pcie, reg, cfg); > > - return 0; > + return is_64bits ? 1 : 0; > } > > static void cdns_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > index b20b2651caf9..f3c19f8ff8e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > as_type = DW_PCIE_AS_IO; > > ret = dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(ep, bar, bar_phys, as_type); > - if (ret) > + if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); > @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > } > dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > > - return 0; > + return (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 1 : 0; > } > > static int dw_pcie_find_index(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, phys_addr_t addr, > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > index 7c70433b11a7..09878e011284 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > @@ -379,12 +379,17 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf) > ret = pci_epc_set_bar(epc, epf->func_no, bar, > epf_bar->phys_addr, > epf_bar->size, bar_flags[bar]); > - if (ret) { > + if (ret < 0) { > pci_epf_free_space(epf, epf_test->reg[bar], bar); > dev_err(dev, "failed to set BAR%d\n", bar); > if (bar == test_reg_bar) > return ret; > } > + /* > + * pci_epc_set_bar() returns 1 if a 64-bit BAR was set-up, > + * or 0 if a 32-bit BAR was set-up. > + */ > + bar += ret; I'd prefer having a new argument bool *is_64bit in set_bar rather than having to work with return value of set_bar. Even otherwise, can't we set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 based on size in pci-epf-test itself? Thanks Kishon
diff --git a/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c b/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c index 3c3a97743453..0e4cc4cca56d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int cdns_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, enum pci_barno bar, CDNS_PCIE_LM_EP_FUNC_BAR_CFG_BAR_CTRL(b, ctrl)); cdns_pcie_writel(pcie, reg, cfg); - return 0; + return is_64bits ? 1 : 0; } static void cdns_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c index b20b2651caf9..f3c19f8ff8e5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, as_type = DW_PCIE_AS_IO; ret = dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(ep, bar, bar_phys, as_type); - if (ret) + if (ret < 0) return ret; dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, } dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); - return 0; + return (flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 1 : 0; } static int dw_pcie_find_index(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, phys_addr_t addr, diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c index 7c70433b11a7..09878e011284 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c @@ -379,12 +379,17 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf) ret = pci_epc_set_bar(epc, epf->func_no, bar, epf_bar->phys_addr, epf_bar->size, bar_flags[bar]); - if (ret) { + if (ret < 0) { pci_epf_free_space(epf, epf_test->reg[bar], bar); dev_err(dev, "failed to set BAR%d\n", bar); if (bar == test_reg_bar) return ret; } + /* + * pci_epc_set_bar() returns 1 if a 64-bit BAR was set-up, + * or 0 if a 32-bit BAR was set-up. + */ + bar += ret; } return 0;
In order to properly handle 64-bit BARs, we need to know what BAR width that was actually set-up by specific pci_epc_set_bar() implementations. This is done so that we can know if we need to skip a BAR, since a 64-bit BAR consists of a BAR pair. It is important to know the BAR width that was actually set-up, since some drivers, like the Cadence EP controller, does not simply look at PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64, as it configures all BARs larger than 2G as 64-bit. Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com> --- drivers/pci/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 ++-- drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 7 ++++++- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)