diff mbox

[v3,2/3] PCI: Allow specifying devices using a base bus and path of devfns

Message ID 20180618193636.16210-3-logang@deltatee.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Delegated to: Bjorn Helgaas
Headers show

Commit Message

Logan Gunthorpe June 18, 2018, 7:36 p.m. UTC 
When specifying PCI devices on the kernel command line using a
BDF, the bus numbers can change when adding or replacing a device,
changing motherboard firmware, or applying kernel parameters like
pci=assign-buses. When this happens, it is usually undesirable to
apply whatever command line tweak to the wrong device.

Therefore, it is useful to be able to specify devices with a base
bus number and the path of devfns needed to get to it. (Similar to
the "device scope" structure in the Intel VT-d spec, Section 8.3.1.)

Thus, we add an option to specify devices in the following format:

[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>[/<slot>.<func>][/ ...]

The path can be any segment within the PCI hierarchy of any length and
determined through the use of 'lspci -t'. When specified this way, it is
less likely that a renumbered bus will result in a valid device specification
and the tweak won't be applied to the wrong device.

Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |   8 +-
 drivers/pci/pci.c                               | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Comments

Alex Williamson June 18, 2018, 9:55 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:36:35 -0600
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote:

> When specifying PCI devices on the kernel command line using a
> BDF, the bus numbers can change when adding or replacing a device,
> changing motherboard firmware, or applying kernel parameters like
> pci=assign-buses. When this happens, it is usually undesirable to
> apply whatever command line tweak to the wrong device.
> 
> Therefore, it is useful to be able to specify devices with a base
> bus number and the path of devfns needed to get to it. (Similar to
> the "device scope" structure in the Intel VT-d spec, Section 8.3.1.)
> 
> Thus, we add an option to specify devices in the following format:
> 
> [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>[/<slot>.<func>][/ ...]
> 
> The path can be any segment within the PCI hierarchy of any length and
> determined through the use of 'lspci -t'. When specified this way, it is
> less likely that a renumbered bus will result in a valid device specification
> and the tweak won't be applied to the wrong device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |   8 +-
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                               | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Matthew Wilcox June 21, 2018, 7:22 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:36:35PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> @@ -3000,14 +3000,18 @@
>  				or a set of devices (<pci_dev>). These are
>  				specified in one of the following formats:
>  
> -				[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>
> +				[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>[/<slot>.<func>][/ ...]

How about:
+				[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>[/<slot>.<func>]*

> -				by other kernel parameters. The second format
> +				by other kernel parameters. Optionally
> +				a path from a device through multiple

I think that's "a path to a device", because you'd start by specifying the
root port, then continuing down the hierarchy, right?

> + * Test if a string (typically from a kernel parameter) formated as a

formatted

> + * path of slot/function addresses matches a PCI device. The string must
> + * be of the form:
> + *
> + *   [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
> + *
> + * A path for a device can be obtained using 'lspci -t'. Using a path
> + * is more robust against renumbering of devices than using only

I'd call it bus renumbering rather than device renumbering.  After all,
if the device got renumbered, this would fail ;-)

>   * pci_dev_str_match - test if a string matches a device
>   * @dev:    the PCI device to test
>   * @p:      string to match the device against
>   * @endptr: pointer to the string after the match
>   *
>   * Test if a string (typically from a kernel parameter) matches a
> - * specified. The string may be of one of two forms formats:
> + * specified. The string may be of one of three formats:

Surely just "The string may be in one of three formats"

>   *
>   *   [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>
> + *   path:[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
>   *   pci:<vendor>:<device>[:<subvendor>:<subdevice>]

I think you're dropped the "path:" prefix from your parser?

>   * The first format specifies a PCI bus/slot/function address which
>   * may change if new hardware is inserted, if motherboard firmware changes,
>   * or due to changes caused in kernel parameters.
>   *
> - * The second format matches devices using IDs in the configuration
> + * The second format specifies a PCI bus/slot/function root address and
> + * a path of slot/function addresses to the specific device from the root.
> + * The path for a device can be determined through the use of 'lspci -t'.
> + * This format is more robust against renumbering issues than the first format.
> +
> + * The third format matches devices using IDs in the configuration
>   * space which may match multiple devices in the system. A value of 0
>   * for any field will match all devices.
>   *

So you probably want to reword this too.  Two formats, one with optional
trailing path elements?
Logan Gunthorpe June 21, 2018, 9 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 21/06/18 01:22 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:36:35PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> So you probably want to reword this too.  Two formats, one with optional
> trailing path elements?

Thanks for the review Matthew! I've addressed all your feedback for a v4
which I'll post shortly.

Logan
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 760fb2b0b349..d45285e1ab6a 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3000,14 +3000,18 @@ 
 				or a set of devices (<pci_dev>). These are
 				specified in one of the following formats:
 
-				[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>
+				[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>[/<slot>.<func>][/ ...]
 				pci:<vendor>:<device>[:<subvendor>:<subdevice>]
 
 				Note: the first format specifies a PCI
 				bus/slot/function address which may change
 				if new hardware is inserted, if motherboard
 				firmware changes, or due to changes caused
-				by other kernel parameters. The second format
+				by other kernel parameters. Optionally
+				a path from a device through multiple
+				slot/function addresses can be specified
+				after the base address (this is more robust
+				against renumbering issues). The second format
 				selects devices using IDs from the
 				configuration space which may match multiple
 				devices in the system.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index bec1bef6f326..6fbad0492461 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -192,22 +192,111 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ioremap_wc_bar);
 #endif
 
 /**
+ * pci_dev_str_match_path - test if a path string matches a device
+ * @dev:    the PCI device to test
+ * @p:      string to match the device against
+ * @endptr: pointer to the string after the match
+ *
+ * Test if a string (typically from a kernel parameter) formated as a
+ * path of slot/function addresses matches a PCI device. The string must
+ * be of the form:
+ *
+ *   [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
+ *
+ * A path for a device can be obtained using 'lspci -t'. Using a path
+ * is more robust against renumbering of devices than using only
+ * a single bus, slot and function address.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if the string matches the device, 0 if it does not and
+ * a negative error code if it fails to parse the string.
+ */
+static int pci_dev_str_match_path(struct pci_dev *dev, const char *path,
+				  const char **endptr)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int seg, bus, slot, func;
+	char *wpath, *p;
+	char end;
+
+	*endptr = strchrnul(path, ';');
+
+	wpath = kmemdup_nul(path, *endptr - path, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!wpath)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	while (1) {
+		p = strrchr(wpath, '/');
+		if (!p)
+			break;
+		ret = sscanf(p, "/%x.%x%c", &slot, &func, &end);
+		if (ret != 2) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto free_and_exit;
+		}
+
+		if (dev->devfn != PCI_DEVFN(slot, func)) {
+			ret = 0;
+			goto free_and_exit;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Note: we don't need to get a reference to the upstream
+		 * bridge because we hold a reference to the top level
+		 * device which should hold a reference to the bridge,
+		 * and so on.
+		 */
+		dev = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
+		if (!dev) {
+			ret = 0;
+			goto free_and_exit;
+		}
+
+		*p = 0;
+	}
+
+	ret = sscanf(wpath, "%x:%x:%x.%x%c", &seg, &bus, &slot,
+		     &func, &end);
+	if (ret != 4) {
+		seg = 0;
+		ret = sscanf(wpath, "%x:%x.%x%c", &bus, &slot, &func, &end);
+		if (ret != 3) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto free_and_exit;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = (seg == pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) &&
+	       bus == dev->bus->number &&
+	       dev->devfn == PCI_DEVFN(slot, func));
+
+free_and_exit:
+	kfree(wpath);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
  * pci_dev_str_match - test if a string matches a device
  * @dev:    the PCI device to test
  * @p:      string to match the device against
  * @endptr: pointer to the string after the match
  *
  * Test if a string (typically from a kernel parameter) matches a
- * specified. The string may be of one of two forms formats:
+ * specified. The string may be of one of three formats:
  *
  *   [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>
+ *   path:[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
  *   pci:<vendor>:<device>[:<subvendor>:<subdevice>]
  *
  * The first format specifies a PCI bus/slot/function address which
  * may change if new hardware is inserted, if motherboard firmware changes,
  * or due to changes caused in kernel parameters.
  *
- * The second format matches devices using IDs in the configuration
+ * The second format specifies a PCI bus/slot/function root address and
+ * a path of slot/function addresses to the specific device from the root.
+ * The path for a device can be determined through the use of 'lspci -t'.
+ * This format is more robust against renumbering issues than the first format.
+
+ * The third format matches devices using IDs in the configuration
  * space which may match multiple devices in the system. A value of 0
  * for any field will match all devices.
  *
@@ -218,7 +307,7 @@  static int pci_dev_str_match(struct pci_dev *dev, const char *p,
 			     const char **endptr)
 {
 	int ret;
-	int seg, bus, slot, func, count;
+	int count;
 	unsigned short vendor, device, subsystem_vendor, subsystem_device;
 
 	if (strncmp(p, "pci:", 4) == 0) {
@@ -244,25 +333,16 @@  static int pci_dev_str_match(struct pci_dev *dev, const char *p,
 		    (!subsystem_device ||
 			    subsystem_device == dev->subsystem_device))
 			goto found;
-
 	} else {
-		/* PCI Bus,Slot,Function ids are specified */
-		ret = sscanf(p, "%x:%x:%x.%x%n", &seg, &bus, &slot,
-			     &func, &count);
-		if (ret != 4) {
-			seg = 0;
-			ret = sscanf(p, "%x:%x.%x%n", &bus, &slot,
-				     &func, &count);
-			if (ret != 3)
-				return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
-		p += count;
+		/*
+		 * PCI Bus,Slot,Function ids are specified
+		 *  (optionally, may include a path of devfns following it)
+		 */
 
-		if (seg == pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) &&
-		    bus == dev->bus->number &&
-		    slot == PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) &&
-		    func == PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn))
+		ret = pci_dev_str_match_path(dev, p, &p);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+		else if (ret)
 			goto found;
 	}