| Message ID | 20190823151832.14427-1-vidyas@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PCI: tegra: Don't print an error on -EPROBE_DEFER | expand |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 08:48:32PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > APIs like devm_regulator_get() and devm_phy_get() have the potential to > return -EPROBE_DEFER when the respective sub-systems are not ready yet. > So avoid printing an error message as .probe() will be tried out again > at a later point of time anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Squashed in pci/tegra, thanks. Lorenzo > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > index fc0dbeb31d78..c730986ed34d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > @@ -1368,9 +1368,11 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > pcie->pex_ctl_supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vddio-pex-ctl"); > if (IS_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)) { > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n", > - PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)); > - return PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply); > + ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply); > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)); > + return ret; > } > > pcie->core_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core"); > @@ -1412,7 +1414,8 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > kfree(name); > if (IS_ERR(phys[i])) { > ret = PTR_ERR(phys[i]); > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY: %d\n", ret); > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY: %d\n", ret); > return ret; > } > } > -- > 2.17.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c index fc0dbeb31d78..c730986ed34d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c @@ -1368,9 +1368,11 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pcie->pex_ctl_supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vddio-pex-ctl"); if (IS_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)) { - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n", - PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)); - return PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply); + ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)); + return ret; } pcie->core_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core"); @@ -1412,7 +1414,8 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) kfree(name); if (IS_ERR(phys[i])) { ret = PTR_ERR(phys[i]); - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY: %d\n", ret); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY: %d\n", ret); return ret; } }
APIs like devm_regulator_get() and devm_phy_get() have the potential to return -EPROBE_DEFER when the respective sub-systems are not ready yet. So avoid printing an error message as .probe() will be tried out again at a later point of time anyway. Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)