| Message ID | 20191005164212.3646-2-vidyas@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] PCI: tegra: Fix CLKREQ dependency programming | expand |
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 10:12:12PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > Although Tegra194 has support for CLKREQ sideband signal and P2972 > has routing of the same till the slot, it is the case most of the time > that the connected device doesn't have CLKREQ support. Hence, it makes > sense to assume that there is no CLKREQ support by default and it can > be enabled on need basis when a card with CLKREQ support is connected. > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) Applied to for-5.5/arm64/dt, thanks. Thierry > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi > index a312c051448b..11220d97adb8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi > @@ -1186,7 +1186,6 @@ > > nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 1>; > > - supports-clkreq; > nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; > nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; > nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; > @@ -1232,7 +1231,6 @@ > > nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 2>; > > - supports-clkreq; > nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; > nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; > nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; > @@ -1278,7 +1276,6 @@ > > nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 3>; > > - supports-clkreq; > nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; > nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; > nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; > @@ -1324,7 +1321,6 @@ > > nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 4>; > > - supports-clkreq; > nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; > nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; > nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; > @@ -1370,7 +1366,6 @@ > > nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 0>; > > - supports-clkreq; > nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; > nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; > nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; > @@ -1420,7 +1415,6 @@ > interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0>; > interrupt-map = <0 0 0 0 &gic GIC_SPI 53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > - supports-clkreq; > nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; > nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; > nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; > -- > 2.17.1 >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi index a312c051448b..11220d97adb8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi @@ -1186,7 +1186,6 @@ nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 1>; - supports-clkreq; nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; @@ -1232,7 +1231,6 @@ nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 2>; - supports-clkreq; nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; @@ -1278,7 +1276,6 @@ nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 3>; - supports-clkreq; nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; @@ -1324,7 +1321,6 @@ nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 4>; - supports-clkreq; nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; @@ -1370,7 +1366,6 @@ nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp 0>; - supports-clkreq; nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>; @@ -1420,7 +1415,6 @@ interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0>; interrupt-map = <0 0 0 0 &gic GIC_SPI 53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; - supports-clkreq; nvidia,aspm-cmrt-us = <60>; nvidia,aspm-pwr-on-t-us = <20>; nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us = <3>;
Although Tegra194 has support for CLKREQ sideband signal and P2972 has routing of the same till the slot, it is the case most of the time that the connected device doesn't have CLKREQ support. Hence, it makes sense to assume that there is no CLKREQ support by default and it can be enabled on need basis when a card with CLKREQ support is connected. Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)