| Message ID | 20200110191500.9538-3-vidyas@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PCI: Add MCFG quirks for Tegra194 host controllers | expand |
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:45:00AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant. > With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be enabled > only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers > starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid this > abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller but to enable > configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this approach, > ops are added through MCFG quirk mechanism which access the configuration > spaces by dynamically programming iATU (internal AddressTranslation Unit) > to generate respective configuration accesses just like the way it is > done in DesignWare core sub-system. > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > --- > V3: > * Removed MCFG address hardcoding in pci_mcfg.c file > * Started using 'dbi_base' for accessing root port's own config space > * and using 'config_base' for accessing config space of downstream hierarchy > > V2: > * Fixed build issues reported by kbuild test bot > > drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 7 ++ > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 3 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
[+cc Krzysztof for .bus_shift below] This is [2/2] but I don't see a [1/2]. Is there something missing? On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:45:00AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant. > With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be enabled > only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers > starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid this > abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller but to enable > configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this approach, > ops are added through MCFG quirk mechanism which access the configuration > spaces by dynamically programming iATU (internal AddressTranslation Unit) > to generate respective configuration accesses just like the way it is > done in DesignWare core sub-system. Is this a published erratum in the device? The purpose of specs is so we can run existing code on new platforms without having to add quirks like this, so I'm looking for some acknowledgement that this is an issue that will be fixed in future designs. Ideally this would be a URL to published errata, and we would include the text or a synopsis here in the commit log. > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> What is this "Reported-by" telling me? Normally this would be a person who could supply more information about a defect we're fixing and might be able to test the fix. > --- > V3: > * Removed MCFG address hardcoding in pci_mcfg.c file > * Started using 'dbi_base' for accessing root port's own config space > * and using 'config_base' for accessing config space of downstream hierarchy > > V2: > * Fixed build issues reported by kbuild test bot Ah, I see this is probably where the "Reported-by" came from. To me, it would make sense to add the tag if the commit *only* fixes the build problem so it's obvious what the robot reported. But here, the build fix got squashed in before merging, so it's more like a general review comment and I think the robot's response on the mailing list is probably enough. > drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 7 ++ > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 3 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > index 6b347d9920cc..707181408173 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > @@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = { > THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 12), > THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 13), > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 4, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + > #define XGENE_V1_ECAM_MCFG(rev, seg) \ > {"APM ", "XGENE ", rev, seg, MCFG_BUS_ANY, \ > &xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops } > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > index 0830dfcfa43a..f5b9e75aceed 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > @@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194 > select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U > help > Say Y here if you want support for DesignWare core based PCIe host > - controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. > + controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. ACPI platforms with Tegra194 > + don't need to enable this. > > config PCIE_UNIPHIER > bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe controllers" > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > index 8a637cfcf6e9..76a6c52b8500 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o > > # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI > @@ -33,4 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o > ifdef CONFIG_PCI > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-al.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-hisi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-tegra194.o > endif > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > index cbe95f0ea0ca..660f55caa8be 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ > #include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/of_pci.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h> > #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > @@ -285,6 +287,103 @@ struct tegra_pcie_dw { > struct dentry *debugfs; > }; > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) > +struct tegra194_pcie_acpi { > + void __iomem *config_base; > + void __iomem *iatu_base; > + void __iomem *dbi_base; > +}; > + > +static int tegra194_acpi_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg) > +{ > + struct device *dev = cfg->parent; > + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie; "pcie" doesn't seem like the best name for this since everywhere else in this driver, "pcie" is a "struct tegra_pcie_dw *". Maybe "mcfg" or similar? With some rename of tegra194_pcie_acpi along the same lines, since it really isn't ACPI-specific. It's just that the ACPI MCFG table happens to be the way to discover the ECAM address space. > + pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pcie) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pcie->config_base = cfg->win; > + pcie->iatu_base = cfg->win + SZ_256K; > + pcie->dbi_base = cfg->win + SZ_512K; > + cfg->priv = pcie; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline void atu_reg_write(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, > + u32 val, u32 reg) "inline" is pointless, I think, since this isn't a performance path and the compiler will probably inline it by itself. > +{ > + u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index); > + > + writel(val, pcie->iatu_base + offset + reg); > +} > + > +static void program_outbound_atu(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, > + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) > +{ > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(pci_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1), > + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(pci_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2); > +} > + > +static void __iomem *tegra194_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int where) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie = cfg->priv; > + u32 busdev; > + int type; > + > + if (bus->number < cfg->busr.start || bus->number > cfg->busr.end) > + return NULL; > + > + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start) { > + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) > + return pcie->dbi_base + where; > + else > + return NULL; > + } > + > + busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) | > + PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn)); > + > + if (bus->parent->number == cfg->busr.start) { > + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) > + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0; > + else > + return NULL; > + } else { > + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1; > + } > + > + program_outbound_atu(pcie, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, type, > + cfg->res.start, busdev, SZ_256K); I don't see a PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0 definition. Maybe that's what's in the [1/2] patch? I guess there's some way to be sure this ATU isn't used for other purposes? > + return (void __iomem *)(pcie->config_base + where); Isn't the type correct even without the cast, same as above for "pcie->dbi_base + where"? > +} > + > +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = { > + .bus_shift = 20, I think e7708f5b10e2 ("PCI: Unify ECAM constants in native PCI Express drivers") means you don't need this .bus_shift. > + .init = tegra194_acpi_init, > + .pci_ops = { > + .map_bus = tegra194_map_bus, > + .read = pci_generic_config_read, > + .write = pci_generic_config_write, > + } > +}; > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) */ > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 > + > static inline struct tegra_pcie_dw *to_tegra_pcie(struct dw_pcie *pci) > { > return container_of(pci, struct tegra_pcie_dw, pci); > @@ -1728,3 +1827,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_pcie_dw_of_match); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>"); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA PCIe host controller driver"); > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > + > +#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 */ > + > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h > index a73164c85e78..6156140dcbb6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ extern struct pci_ecam_ops pci_thunder_ecam_ops; /* Cavium ThunderX 1.x */ > extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v1 */ > extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v2_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v2.x */ > extern struct pci_ecam_ops al_pcie_ops; /* Amazon Annapurna Labs PCIe */ > +extern struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops; /* Tegra194 PCIe */ > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_HOST_COMMON > -- > 2.17.1 >
Hi Bjorn and Vidya, [...] > > +} > > + > > +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = { > > + .bus_shift = 20, > > I think e7708f5b10e2 ("PCI: Unify ECAM constants in native PCI Express > drivers") means you don't need this .bus_shift. [...] Correct. If this platform implements ECAM as per the specification, then the .bus_shift initializer is no longer needed. Krzysztof
On 3/6/2021 3:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > [+cc Krzysztof for .bus_shift below] > > This is [2/2] but I don't see a [1/2]. Is there something missing? > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:45:00AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: >> The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant. >> With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be enabled >> only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers >> starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid this >> abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller but to enable >> configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this approach, >> ops are added through MCFG quirk mechanism which access the configuration >> spaces by dynamically programming iATU (internal AddressTranslation Unit) >> to generate respective configuration accesses just like the way it is >> done in DesignWare core sub-system. > > Is this a published erratum in the device? The purpose of specs is so > we can run existing code on new platforms without having to add quirks > like this, so I'm looking for some acknowledgement that this is an > issue that will be fixed in future designs. Yes. This would be fixed in the following SoC. > > Ideally this would be a URL to published errata, and we would include > the text or a synopsis here in the commit log. > >> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > What is this "Reported-by" telling me? Normally this would be a > person who could supply more information about a defect we're fixing > and might be able to test the fix. I'll remove this. > >> --- >> V3: >> * Removed MCFG address hardcoding in pci_mcfg.c file >> * Started using 'dbi_base' for accessing root port's own config space >> * and using 'config_base' for accessing config space of downstream hierarchy >> >> V2: >> * Fixed build issues reported by kbuild test bot > > Ah, I see this is probably where the "Reported-by" came from. To me, > it would make sense to add the tag if the commit *only* fixes the > build problem so it's obvious what the robot reported. > > But here, the build fix got squashed in before merging, so it's more > like a general review comment and I think the robot's response on the > mailing list is probably enough. > >> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 7 ++ >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 3 +- >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +- >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> index 6b347d9920cc..707181408173 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> @@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = { >> THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 12), >> THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 13), >> >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 4, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + >> #define XGENE_V1_ECAM_MCFG(rev, seg) \ >> {"APM ", "XGENE ", rev, seg, MCFG_BUS_ANY, \ >> &xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops } >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> index 0830dfcfa43a..f5b9e75aceed 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> @@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194 >> select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U >> help >> Say Y here if you want support for DesignWare core based PCIe host >> - controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. >> + controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. ACPI platforms with Tegra194 >> + don't need to enable this. >> >> config PCIE_UNIPHIER >> bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe controllers" >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> index 8a637cfcf6e9..76a6c52b8500 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o >> >> # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI >> @@ -33,4 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o >> ifdef CONFIG_PCI >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-al.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-hisi.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-tegra194.o >> endif >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> index cbe95f0ea0ca..660f55caa8be 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ >> #include <linux/of_irq.h> >> #include <linux/of_pci.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> >> #include <linux/phy/phy.h> >> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> @@ -285,6 +287,103 @@ struct tegra_pcie_dw { >> struct dentry *debugfs; >> }; >> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) >> +struct tegra194_pcie_acpi { >> + void __iomem *config_base; >> + void __iomem *iatu_base; >> + void __iomem *dbi_base; >> +}; >> + >> +static int tegra194_acpi_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = cfg->parent; >> + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie; > > "pcie" doesn't seem like the best name for this since everywhere else > in this driver, "pcie" is a "struct tegra_pcie_dw *". Maybe "mcfg" > or similar? > > With some rename of tegra194_pcie_acpi along the same lines, since it > really isn't ACPI-specific. It's just that the ACPI MCFG table > happens to be the way to discover the ECAM address space. Understood. I'll take care of it in the next patch. > >> + pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!pcie) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + pcie->config_base = cfg->win; >> + pcie->iatu_base = cfg->win + SZ_256K; >> + pcie->dbi_base = cfg->win + SZ_512K; >> + cfg->priv = pcie; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static inline void atu_reg_write(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, >> + u32 val, u32 reg) > > "inline" is pointless, I think, since this isn't a performance path > and the compiler will probably inline it by itself. Ok. I'll remove it in the next patch. > >> +{ >> + u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index); >> + >> + writel(val, pcie->iatu_base + offset + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static void program_outbound_atu(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, >> + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) >> +{ >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(pci_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1), >> + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(pci_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2); >> +} >> + >> +static void __iomem *tegra194_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, >> + unsigned int devfn, int where) >> +{ >> + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; >> + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie = cfg->priv; >> + u32 busdev; >> + int type; >> + >> + if (bus->number < cfg->busr.start || bus->number > cfg->busr.end) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start) { >> + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) >> + return pcie->dbi_base + where; >> + else >> + return NULL; >> + } >> + >> + busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) | >> + PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn)); >> + >> + if (bus->parent->number == cfg->busr.start) { >> + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) >> + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0; >> + else >> + return NULL; >> + } else { >> + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1; >> + } >> + >> + program_outbound_atu(pcie, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, type, >> + cfg->res.start, busdev, SZ_256K); > > I don't see a PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0 definition. Maybe that's what's > in the [1/2] patch? I guess there's some way to be sure this ATU > isn't used for other purposes? > >> + return (void __iomem *)(pcie->config_base + where); > > Isn't the type correct even without the cast, same as above for > "pcie->dbi_base + where"? Correct. I'll address it in the next patch. > >> +} >> + >> +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = { >> + .bus_shift = 20, > > I think e7708f5b10e2 ("PCI: Unify ECAM constants in native PCI Express > drivers") means you don't need this .bus_shift. Correct. I'll remove this in the next patch. > >> + .init = tegra194_acpi_init, >> + .pci_ops = { >> + .map_bus = tegra194_map_bus, >> + .read = pci_generic_config_read, >> + .write = pci_generic_config_write, >> + } >> +}; >> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) */ >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 >> + >> static inline struct tegra_pcie_dw *to_tegra_pcie(struct dw_pcie *pci) >> { >> return container_of(pci, struct tegra_pcie_dw, pci); >> @@ -1728,3 +1827,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_pcie_dw_of_match); >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>"); >> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA PCIe host controller driver"); >> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 */ >> + >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h >> index a73164c85e78..6156140dcbb6 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h >> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ extern struct pci_ecam_ops pci_thunder_ecam_ops; /* Cavium ThunderX 1.x */ >> extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v1 */ >> extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v2_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v2.x */ >> extern struct pci_ecam_ops al_pcie_ops; /* Amazon Annapurna Labs PCIe */ >> +extern struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops; /* Tegra194 PCIe */ >> #endif >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_HOST_COMMON >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>
On 2020/1/11 上午3:15, Vidya Sagar wrote: > The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant. > With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be enabled > only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers > starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid this > abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller but to enable > configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this approach, > ops are added through MCFG quirk mechanism which access the configuration > spaces by dynamically programming iATU (internal AddressTranslation Unit) > to generate respective configuration accesses just like the way it is > done in DesignWare core sub-system. > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Hi Vidya, Mind to update the patch so that guys can test booting tegra194 boards using ACPI with PCIE enabled? I tried to backport this to current kernel, there are some simple conflicts like pci_ecam_ops now are definied with const. But "PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0" is not definited anywhere, not even in the first patch, thus unable to compile at all. I have already tried to boot the Xavier AGX using device tree (5.12-rc8 kernel), although I can boot it from PCIE NVME using upstream device tree, but there seems to be something wrong, as just trying to push kernel git to the fs on NVME can lead to random crash. Thus if we can test booting using ACPI with PCIE, maybe we can find if it's really the upstream device tree causing the problem. Thanks, Qu > --- > V3: > * Removed MCFG address hardcoding in pci_mcfg.c file > * Started using 'dbi_base' for accessing root port's own config space > * and using 'config_base' for accessing config space of downstream hierarchy > > V2: > * Fixed build issues reported by kbuild test bot > > drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 7 ++ > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 3 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > index 6b347d9920cc..707181408173 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > @@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = { > THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 12), > THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 13), > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 4, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, > + > #define XGENE_V1_ECAM_MCFG(rev, seg) \ > {"APM ", "XGENE ", rev, seg, MCFG_BUS_ANY, \ > &xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops } > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > index 0830dfcfa43a..f5b9e75aceed 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > @@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194 > select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U > help > Say Y here if you want support for DesignWare core based PCIe host > - controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. > + controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. ACPI platforms with Tegra194 > + don't need to enable this. > > config PCIE_UNIPHIER > bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe controllers" > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > index 8a637cfcf6e9..76a6c52b8500 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o > > # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI > @@ -33,4 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o > ifdef CONFIG_PCI > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-al.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-hisi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-tegra194.o > endif > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > index cbe95f0ea0ca..660f55caa8be 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ > #include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/of_pci.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h> > #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > @@ -285,6 +287,103 @@ struct tegra_pcie_dw { > struct dentry *debugfs; > }; > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) > +struct tegra194_pcie_acpi { > + void __iomem *config_base; > + void __iomem *iatu_base; > + void __iomem *dbi_base; > +}; > + > +static int tegra194_acpi_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg) > +{ > + struct device *dev = cfg->parent; > + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie; > + > + pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pcie) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pcie->config_base = cfg->win; > + pcie->iatu_base = cfg->win + SZ_256K; > + pcie->dbi_base = cfg->win + SZ_512K; > + cfg->priv = pcie; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline void atu_reg_write(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, > + u32 val, u32 reg) > +{ > + u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index); > + > + writel(val, pcie->iatu_base + offset + reg); > +} > + > +static void program_outbound_atu(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, > + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) > +{ > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(pci_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1), > + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(pci_addr), > + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1); > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2); > +} > + > +static void __iomem *tegra194_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int where) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie = cfg->priv; > + u32 busdev; > + int type; > + > + if (bus->number < cfg->busr.start || bus->number > cfg->busr.end) > + return NULL; > + > + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start) { > + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) > + return pcie->dbi_base + where; > + else > + return NULL; > + } > + > + busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) | > + PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn)); > + > + if (bus->parent->number == cfg->busr.start) { > + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) > + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0; > + else > + return NULL; > + } else { > + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1; > + } > + > + program_outbound_atu(pcie, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, type, > + cfg->res.start, busdev, SZ_256K); > + return (void __iomem *)(pcie->config_base + where); > +} > + > +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = { > + .bus_shift = 20, > + .init = tegra194_acpi_init, > + .pci_ops = { > + .map_bus = tegra194_map_bus, > + .read = pci_generic_config_read, > + .write = pci_generic_config_write, > + } > +}; > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) */ > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 > + > static inline struct tegra_pcie_dw *to_tegra_pcie(struct dw_pcie *pci) > { > return container_of(pci, struct tegra_pcie_dw, pci); > @@ -1728,3 +1827,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_pcie_dw_of_match); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>"); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA PCIe host controller driver"); > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > + > +#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 */ > + > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h > index a73164c85e78..6156140dcbb6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ extern struct pci_ecam_ops pci_thunder_ecam_ops; /* Cavium ThunderX 1.x */ > extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v1 */ > extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v2_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v2.x */ > extern struct pci_ecam_ops al_pcie_ops; /* Amazon Annapurna Labs PCIe */ > +extern struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops; /* Tegra194 PCIe */ > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_HOST_COMMON >
On 5/13/2021 3:10 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On 2020/1/11 上午3:15, Vidya Sagar wrote: >> The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant. >> With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be >> enabled >> only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers >> starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid >> this >> abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller but to enable >> configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this >> approach, >> ops are added through MCFG quirk mechanism which access the configuration >> spaces by dynamically programming iATU (internal AddressTranslation Unit) >> to generate respective configuration accesses just like the way it is >> done in DesignWare core sub-system. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Hi Vidya, > > Mind to update the patch so that guys can test booting tegra194 boards > using ACPI with PCIE enabled? The latest version of this patch is merged and is available in linux-next. > > I tried to backport this to current kernel, there are some simple > conflicts like pci_ecam_ops now are definied with const. > > But "PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0" is not definited anywhere, not even in the > first patch, thus unable to compile at all. > > > I have already tried to boot the Xavier AGX using device tree (5.12-rc8 > kernel), although I can boot it from PCIE NVME using upstream device > tree, but there seems to be something wrong, as just trying to push > kernel git to the fs on NVME can lead to random crash. > > Thus if we can test booting using ACPI with PCIE, maybe we can find if > it's really the upstream device tree causing the problem. > > Thanks, > Qu >> --- >> V3: >> * Removed MCFG address hardcoding in pci_mcfg.c file >> * Started using 'dbi_base' for accessing root port's own config space >> * and using 'config_base' for accessing config space of downstream >> hierarchy >> >> V2: >> * Fixed build issues reported by kbuild test bot >> >> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 7 ++ >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 3 +- >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +- >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> index 6b347d9920cc..707181408173 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> @@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = { >> THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 12), >> THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 13), >> >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 4, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, >> + >> #define XGENE_V1_ECAM_MCFG(rev, seg) \ >> {"APM ", "XGENE ", rev, seg, MCFG_BUS_ANY, \ >> &xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops } >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> index 0830dfcfa43a..f5b9e75aceed 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig >> @@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194 >> select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U >> help >> Say Y here if you want support for DesignWare core based PCIe >> host >> - controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. >> + controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. ACPI platforms with >> Tegra194 >> + don't need to enable this. >> >> config PCIE_UNIPHIER >> bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe controllers" >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> index 8a637cfcf6e9..76a6c52b8500 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile >> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o >> >> # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI >> @@ -33,4 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o >> ifdef CONFIG_PCI >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-al.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-hisi.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-tegra194.o >> endif >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> index cbe95f0ea0ca..660f55caa8be 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c >> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ >> #include <linux/of_irq.h> >> #include <linux/of_pci.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> >> #include <linux/phy/phy.h> >> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> @@ -285,6 +287,103 @@ struct tegra_pcie_dw { >> struct dentry *debugfs; >> }; >> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) >> +struct tegra194_pcie_acpi { >> + void __iomem *config_base; >> + void __iomem *iatu_base; >> + void __iomem *dbi_base; >> +}; >> + >> +static int tegra194_acpi_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = cfg->parent; >> + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie; >> + >> + pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!pcie) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + pcie->config_base = cfg->win; >> + pcie->iatu_base = cfg->win + SZ_256K; >> + pcie->dbi_base = cfg->win + SZ_512K; >> + cfg->priv = pcie; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static inline void atu_reg_write(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int >> index, >> + u32 val, u32 reg) >> +{ >> + u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index); >> + >> + writel(val, pcie->iatu_base + offset + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static void program_outbound_atu(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int >> index, >> + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, >> u64 size) >> +{ >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(pci_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1), >> + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(pci_addr), >> + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1); >> + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2); >> +} >> + >> +static void __iomem *tegra194_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, >> + unsigned int devfn, int where) >> +{ >> + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; >> + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie = cfg->priv; >> + u32 busdev; >> + int type; >> + >> + if (bus->number < cfg->busr.start || bus->number > cfg->busr.end) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start) { >> + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) >> + return pcie->dbi_base + where; >> + else >> + return NULL; >> + } >> + >> + busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | >> PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) | >> + PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn)); >> + >> + if (bus->parent->number == cfg->busr.start) { >> + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) >> + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0; >> + else >> + return NULL; >> + } else { >> + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1; >> + } >> + >> + program_outbound_atu(pcie, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, type, >> + cfg->res.start, busdev, SZ_256K); >> + return (void __iomem *)(pcie->config_base + where); >> +} >> + >> +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = { >> + .bus_shift = 20, >> + .init = tegra194_acpi_init, >> + .pci_ops = { >> + .map_bus = tegra194_map_bus, >> + .read = pci_generic_config_read, >> + .write = pci_generic_config_write, >> + } >> +}; >> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) */ >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 >> + >> static inline struct tegra_pcie_dw *to_tegra_pcie(struct dw_pcie *pci) >> { >> return container_of(pci, struct tegra_pcie_dw, pci); >> @@ -1728,3 +1827,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_pcie_dw_of_match); >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>"); >> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA PCIe host controller driver"); >> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 */ >> + >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h >> index a73164c85e78..6156140dcbb6 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h >> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ extern struct pci_ecam_ops pci_thunder_ecam_ops; /* >> Cavium ThunderX 1.x */ >> extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene >> PCIe v1 */ >> extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v2_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene >> PCIe v2.x */ >> extern struct pci_ecam_ops al_pcie_ops; /* Amazon Annapurna Labs >> PCIe */ >> +extern struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops; /* Tegra194 PCIe */ >> #endif >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_HOST_COMMON >>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c index 6b347d9920cc..707181408173 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c @@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = { THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 12), THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 13), + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 4, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops}, + #define XGENE_V1_ECAM_MCFG(rev, seg) \ {"APM ", "XGENE ", rev, seg, MCFG_BUS_ANY, \ &xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops } diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig index 0830dfcfa43a..f5b9e75aceed 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig @@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194 select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U help Say Y here if you want support for DesignWare core based PCIe host - controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. + controller found in NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC. ACPI platforms with Tegra194 + don't need to enable this. config PCIE_UNIPHIER bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe controllers" diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile index 8a637cfcf6e9..76a6c52b8500 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o -obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI @@ -33,4 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o ifdef CONFIG_PCI obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-al.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-hisi.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += pcie-tegra194.o endif diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c index cbe95f0ea0ca..660f55caa8be 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ #include <linux/of_irq.h> #include <linux/of_pci.h> #include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> #include <linux/phy/phy.h> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> @@ -285,6 +287,103 @@ struct tegra_pcie_dw { struct dentry *debugfs; }; +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) +struct tegra194_pcie_acpi { + void __iomem *config_base; + void __iomem *iatu_base; + void __iomem *dbi_base; +}; + +static int tegra194_acpi_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg) +{ + struct device *dev = cfg->parent; + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie; + + pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pcie) + return -ENOMEM; + + pcie->config_base = cfg->win; + pcie->iatu_base = cfg->win + SZ_256K; + pcie->dbi_base = cfg->win + SZ_512K; + cfg->priv = pcie; + + return 0; +} + +static inline void atu_reg_write(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, + u32 val, u32 reg) +{ + u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index); + + writel(val, pcie->iatu_base + offset + reg); +} + +static void program_outbound_atu(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index, + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size) +{ + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr), + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE); + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr), + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE); + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(pci_addr), + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET); + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1), + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT); + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(pci_addr), + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET); + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1); + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2); +} + +static void __iomem *tegra194_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, + unsigned int devfn, int where) +{ + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie = cfg->priv; + u32 busdev; + int type; + + if (bus->number < cfg->busr.start || bus->number > cfg->busr.end) + return NULL; + + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start) { + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) + return pcie->dbi_base + where; + else + return NULL; + } + + busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) | + PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn)); + + if (bus->parent->number == cfg->busr.start) { + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0) + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0; + else + return NULL; + } else { + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1; + } + + program_outbound_atu(pcie, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, type, + cfg->res.start, busdev, SZ_256K); + return (void __iomem *)(pcie->config_base + where); +} + +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = { + .bus_shift = 20, + .init = tegra194_acpi_init, + .pci_ops = { + .map_bus = tegra194_map_bus, + .read = pci_generic_config_read, + .write = pci_generic_config_write, + } +}; +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 + static inline struct tegra_pcie_dw *to_tegra_pcie(struct dw_pcie *pci) { return container_of(pci, struct tegra_pcie_dw, pci); @@ -1728,3 +1827,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_pcie_dw_of_match); MODULE_AUTHOR("Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA PCIe host controller driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); + +#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 */ + diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h index a73164c85e78..6156140dcbb6 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ extern struct pci_ecam_ops pci_thunder_ecam_ops; /* Cavium ThunderX 1.x */ extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v1 */ extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v2_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v2.x */ extern struct pci_ecam_ops al_pcie_ops; /* Amazon Annapurna Labs PCIe */ +extern struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops; /* Tegra194 PCIe */ #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_HOST_COMMON
The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant. With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be enabled only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid this abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller but to enable configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this approach, ops are added through MCFG quirk mechanism which access the configuration spaces by dynamically programming iATU (internal AddressTranslation Unit) to generate respective configuration accesses just like the way it is done in DesignWare core sub-system. Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> --- V3: * Removed MCFG address hardcoding in pci_mcfg.c file * Started using 'dbi_base' for accessing root port's own config space * and using 'config_base' for accessing config space of downstream hierarchy V2: * Fixed build issues reported by kbuild test bot drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 7 ++ drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 3 +- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)