From patchwork Mon Jun 21 23:52:45 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Douglas Anderson X-Patchwork-Id: 12336107 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bhelgaas@google.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2451C49EA6 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89315611C1 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232374AbhFUXzd (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 19:55:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232347AbhFUXzb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 19:55:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92326C061574 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id k5so10930089pjj.1 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:53:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1hap5rrkK42QaF5phRIGliKevrZCv+fxjBjTLJ/pE7w=; b=SaTkql2WXjMyJO6whWG9JyCnglGg6faOh30E8Lhu9SgvFGWDGvulc9SplCY+Wx4hJB DCYHUv1GwmTka12BMkZes72rKui1uDoY0LzvsieTa2ZmIrnL4mVCj5E9Nvn0LnsgSd9a klTw+FraV7UJBMyr3e/hUg0h10KaCLpg93/bc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1hap5rrkK42QaF5phRIGliKevrZCv+fxjBjTLJ/pE7w=; b=CJJVQ/Fq8UhEQ5mdcU4+b5QnMEV4S4xvpt0SQNatzQ3s+dI730h1JS8TlbJAWvMn0C mlAFUOV2Gg0meCIA4gabo6u1y8VfpG/mtq5L83C6NaCKmnAXZIU5Q/cd4iqcoBJDuNgf BXh5/gH6qavYbVaKWtanZUgUOaVLVaa/Gr6/H5boKVVyaCYFP6mojqsDeZkkMPYvMzN2 LvhAUm9f5TnIiD2psLWDK366Nf5IdEyRCoWz7RvkR3hvkWNhTrquwd/Pg2QpFun8ISrD akAwsHo+WLNbqnLmPsW8zFJOdinsBDkWTYDUxlVnZZORVRTpkTu/Jmk4iW7B1G4mOcYv 32aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ws4cWmhw4hoe29Zz6ZyWS3xpWOdTRcFbXK7rmT2yN+M17N7j9 nsH9gwtBlSkaEyJmrOWpaUzq6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXH5vi0Xs9ZIXNanUJNzJ2JIBdTlSTrxUumm5ORFc6vCcYGBtgB9XO+d3fthNCPEvr8XR/lA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6be6:: with SMTP id w93mr598015pjj.171.1624319595138; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tictac2.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:202:201:bdc1:a4b1:b06e:91d1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s27sm4339663pfg.169.2021.06.21.16.53.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Douglas Anderson To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, sonnyrao@chromium.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org, rajatja@google.com, saravanak@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, Douglas Anderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: Indicate that we want to force strict DMA for untrusted devices Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:52:45 -0700 Message-Id: <20210621165230.3.I7accc008905590bb2b46f40f91a4aeda5b378007@changeid> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0.288.g62a8d224e6-goog In-Reply-To: <20210621235248.2521620-1-dianders@chromium.org> References: <20210621235248.2521620-1-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org At the moment the generic IOMMU framework reaches into the PCIe device to check the "untrusted" state and uses this information to figure out if it should be running the IOMMU in strict or non-strict mode. Let's instead set the new boolean in "struct device" to indicate when we want forced strictness. NOTE: we still continue to set the "untrusted" bit in PCIe since that apparently is used for more than just IOMMU strictness. It probably makes sense for a later patchset to clarify all of the other needs we have for "untrusted" PCIe devices (perhaps add more booleans into the "struct device") so we can fully eliminate the need for the IOMMU framework to reach into a PCIe device. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 275204646c68..8d81f0fb3e50 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1572,8 +1572,10 @@ static void set_pcie_untrusted(struct pci_dev *dev) * untrusted as well. */ parent = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); - if (parent && (parent->untrusted || parent->external_facing)) + if (parent && (parent->untrusted || parent->external_facing)) { dev->untrusted = true; + dev->dev.force_strict_iommu = true; + } } /**