| Message ID | 20210811234601.341947-1-utkarshverma294@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PCI: Remove duplicate #ifdef in pci_try_set_mwi() | expand |
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:16:01AM +0530, Utkarsh Verma wrote: > Remove the unnecessary #ifdef PCI_DISABLE_MWI, because pci_set_mwi() > performs the same check. > > Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index aacf575c15cf..7d4c7c294ef2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -4456,11 +4456,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcim_set_mwi); > */ > int pci_try_set_mwi(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > -#ifdef PCI_DISABLE_MWI > - return 0; > -#else > return pci_set_mwi(dev); > -#endif > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_try_set_mwi); If this is the case, why do we even need pci_try_set_mwi()? Why not just replace it with calls to pci_set_mwi() and then delete this one? thanks, greg k-h
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 08:49:21AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:16:01AM +0530, Utkarsh Verma wrote: > > Remove the unnecessary #ifdef PCI_DISABLE_MWI, because pci_set_mwi() > > performs the same check. > > > > Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ---- > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > > index aacf575c15cf..7d4c7c294ef2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > > @@ -4456,11 +4456,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcim_set_mwi); > > */ > > int pci_try_set_mwi(struct pci_dev *dev) > > { > > -#ifdef PCI_DISABLE_MWI > > - return 0; > > -#else > > return pci_set_mwi(dev); > > -#endif > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_try_set_mwi); > > If this is the case, why do we even need pci_try_set_mwi()? Why not > just replace it with calls to pci_set_mwi() and then delete this one? The only difference between the pci_set_mwi() and pci_try_set_mwi() is that, pci_set_mwi() is declared as __must_check which forces return value checking. The reason why pci_try_set_mwi() was introduced in the first place was because it gives the drivers both options: (1) most of the drivers don't require checking the return value, and they can safely ignore the errors values returned if any, so pci_try_set_mwi() can be used. (2) But for some of the drivers it is nice to check the return values, and generate proper warnings for error handling. By using the pci_set_mwi(), we force the driver for proper error checking. So both the functions are similar but have different purposes, and it seems a more appropriate design. The whole argument about adding this function: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20070404213704.224128ec.randy.dunlap@oracle.com/ Also earlier there was a patch that removed the pci_try_set_mwi() and __must_check attribute from pci_set_mwi(), just like you wanted, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/4d535d35-6c8c-2bd8-812b-2b53194ce0ec@gmail.com/ But it was not accepted because Bjorn wasn't convinced and he also gave the above argument and that we should not break something in the name of cleaning it up. But it is safe to only remove the duplicate #ifdef block inside the pci_try_set_mwi(). Best Regards, Utkarsh Verma
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index aacf575c15cf..7d4c7c294ef2 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -4456,11 +4456,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcim_set_mwi); */ int pci_try_set_mwi(struct pci_dev *dev) { -#ifdef PCI_DISABLE_MWI - return 0; -#else return pci_set_mwi(dev); -#endif } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_try_set_mwi);
Remove the unnecessary #ifdef PCI_DISABLE_MWI, because pci_set_mwi() performs the same check. Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com> --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)