@@ -823,8 +823,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
size_t pba_size = 0;
bool msix_capable;
void *base;
- int bar, add;
enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
+ enum pci_barno bar;
const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
size_t test_reg_size;
@@ -849,16 +849,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
}
epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
- for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar += add) {
- epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
- add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
+ for (bar = BAR_0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) {
+ bar = pci_epc_get_next_free_bar(epc_features, bar);
+ if (bar == NO_BAR)
+ break;
if (bar == test_reg_bar)
continue;
- if (epc_features->bar[bar].type == BAR_RESERVED)
- continue;
-
base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, bar_size[bar], bar,
epc_features, PRIMARY_INTERFACE);
if (!base)
@@ -871,7 +869,9 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
* either because the BAR can only be a 64-bit BAR, or if
* we requested a size larger than 4 GB.
*/
- add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
+ epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
+ if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
+ bar++;
}
return 0;
Make pci-epf-test use pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() just like pci-epf-ntb.c and pci-epf-vntb.c. Using pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() also makes it more obvious that pci-epf-test does no special configuration at all. This way, the code is more consistent between EPF drivers, and pci-epf-test does not need to explicitly check if the BAR is reserved, or if the index belongs to a BAR succeeding a 64-bit only BAR. Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org> --- drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)