Message ID | 20240605075419.3973256-1-zhanghongchen@loongson.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] PCI: use local_pci_probe when best selected cpu is offline | expand |
Hi, Hongchen, It seems you forgot to update the title which I have pointed out. :) And Bjorn, Could you please take some time to review this patch? Thank you. Huacai On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:54 PM Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn> wrote: > > When the best selected CPU is offline, work_on_cpu() will stuck forever. > This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are offline > (we can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it), Therefore, > in this case, we should call local_pci_probe() instead of work_on_cpu(). > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> > Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn> > --- > v1 -> v2 Added the method to reproduce this issue > --- > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > index af2996d0d17f..32a99828e6a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev, > free_cpumask_var(wq_domain_mask); > } > > - if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) > + if ((cpu < nr_cpu_ids) && cpu_online(cpu)) > error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi); > else > error = local_pci_probe(&ddi); > -- > 2.33.0 > >
… > This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are offline > (we can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it), Therefore, > in this case, we should call local_pci_probe() instead of work_on_cpu(). * Please take text layout concerns a bit better into account also according to the usage of paragraphs. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc3/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#L128 * Please improve the change description with an imperative wording. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc3#n94 * Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly? * How do you think about to specify the name of the affected function in the summary phrase? Regards, Markus
Hi Markus, Thanks for your review. On 2024/6/13 上午2:08, Markus Elfring wrote: > … >> This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are offline >> (we can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it), Therefore, >> in this case, we should call local_pci_probe() instead of work_on_cpu(). > > * Please take text layout concerns a bit better into account also according to > the usage of paragraphs. > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc3/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#L128OK, Let rewrite the commit message. > * Please improve the change description with an imperative wording. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc3#n94 OK, Let me use imperative word. > * Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly? OK, Let me add Fixes. > * How do you think about to specify the name of the affected function > in the summary phrase? OK, Let me add the affected function in summary phrase. > > Regards, > Markus >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c index af2996d0d17f..32a99828e6a3 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev, free_cpumask_var(wq_domain_mask); } - if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) + if ((cpu < nr_cpu_ids) && cpu_online(cpu)) error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi); else error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);