@@ -242,11 +242,6 @@ static void pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
__pcie_wait_link_active(ctrl, true);
}
-static void pcie_wait_link_not_active(struct controller *ctrl)
-{
- __pcie_wait_link_active(ctrl, false);
-}
-
static bool pci_bus_check_dev(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
{
u32 l;
@@ -332,11 +327,6 @@ static int pciehp_link_enable(struct controller *ctrl)
return __pciehp_link_set(ctrl, true);
}
-static int pciehp_link_disable(struct controller *ctrl)
-{
- return __pciehp_link_set(ctrl, false);
-}
-
void pciehp_get_attention_status(struct slot *slot, u8 *status)
{
struct controller *ctrl = slot->ctrl;
@@ -508,14 +498,6 @@ void pciehp_power_off_slot(struct slot * slot)
{
struct controller *ctrl = slot->ctrl;
- /* Disable the link at first */
- pciehp_link_disable(ctrl);
- /* wait the link is down */
- if (ctrl->link_active_reporting)
- pcie_wait_link_not_active(ctrl);
- else
- msleep(1000);
-
pcie_write_cmd(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_OFF, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC);
ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable the link permanently during device removal. Also, remove the static functions that are now left unused. This reverts part of 2debd9289997 ("PCI: pciehp: Disable/enable link during slot power off/on"). This was dicussed at http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=138963477507425&w=2 where it was revealed that it was done for a bug in a pcie repeater chip on that particular platform. Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net> --- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)