Message ID | e387d04ea235c9a4879a897bb730adc383a96635.1524582822.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On 2018-04-24 17:13, Jan Kiszka wrote: > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > > of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it > fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far. > Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a > managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a > reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node. > > As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot > simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the > new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > --- > drivers/pci/of.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > include/linux/of_pci.h | 14 ++++++-- > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c > index a28355c273ae..6eab0bde2ab3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/of.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c > @@ -243,26 +243,8 @@ void of_pci_check_probe_only(void) > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_check_probe_only); > > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) > -/** > - * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT > - * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property > - * @busno: bus number associated with the bridge root bus > - * @bus_max: maximum number of buses for this bridge > - * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing > - * @io_base: pointer to a variable that will contain on return the physical > - * address for the start of the I/O range. Can be NULL if the caller doesn't > - * expect I/O ranges to be present in the device tree. > - * > - * It is the caller's job to free the @resources list. > - * > - * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device > - * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected > - * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document. > - * > - * It returns zero if the range parsing has been successful or a standard error > - * value if it failed. > - */ > -int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > +static int __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > + struct device_node *dev_node, > unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > { > @@ -277,19 +259,22 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > if (io_base) > *io_base = (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR; > > - bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (dev) > + bus_range = devm_kzalloc(dev,sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); > + else > + bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!bus_range) > return -ENOMEM; > > - pr_info("host bridge %pOF ranges:\n", dev); > + pr_info("host bridge %pOF ranges:\n", dev_node); > > - err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, bus_range); > + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev_node, bus_range); > if (err) { > bus_range->start = busno; > bus_range->end = bus_max; > bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS; > pr_info(" No bus range found for %pOF, using %pR\n", > - dev, bus_range); > + dev_node, bus_range); > } else { > if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + bus_max) > bus_range->end = bus_range->start + bus_max; > @@ -297,7 +282,7 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > pci_add_resource(resources, bus_range); > > /* Check for ranges property */ > - err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev); > + err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev_node); > if (err) > goto parse_failed; > > @@ -321,13 +306,17 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0) > continue; > > - res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (dev) > + res = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct resource), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + else > + res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!res) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto parse_failed; > } > > - err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res); > + err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev_node, res); > if (err) { > kfree(res); > continue; > @@ -336,13 +325,13 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO) { > if (!io_base) { > pr_err("I/O range found for %pOF. Please provide an io_base pointer to save CPU base address\n", > - dev); > + dev_node); > err = -EINVAL; > goto conversion_failed; > } > if (*io_base != (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR) > pr_warn("More than one I/O resource converted for %pOF. CPU base address for old range lost!\n", > - dev); > + dev_node); > *io_base = range.cpu_addr; > } > > @@ -354,12 +343,50 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > conversion_failed: > kfree(res); > parse_failed: > - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > - kfree(window->res); > + if (!dev); > + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > + kfree(window->res); > pci_free_resource_list(resources); > return err; > } > + > +/** > + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT > + * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property > + * @busno: bus number associated with the bridge root bus > + * @bus_max: maximum number of buses for this bridge > + * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing > + * @io_base: pointer to a variable that will contain on return the physical > + * address for the start of the I/O range. Can be NULL if the caller doesn't > + * expect I/O ranges to be present in the device tree. > + * > + * It is the caller's job to free the @resources list. > + * > + * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device > + * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected > + * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document. > + * > + * It returns zero if the range parsing has been successful or a standard error > + * value if it failed. > + */ > +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > +{ > + return __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(NULL, dev_node, busno, > + bus_max, resources, io_base); > +} > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources); > + > +int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > +{ > + return __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(dev, dev->of_node, busno, > + bus_max, resources, io_base); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources); > + > #endif /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */ > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h > index 091033a6b836..08b8f02426a5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of_pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h > @@ -71,11 +71,21 @@ of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin) > #endif > > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) > -int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base); > +int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base); > #else > -static inline int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > +static inline int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +static inline int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > { > I left a small reviewer exercise in this patch behind, just noticed during a backport. Will resolved it via some v2, just waiting in case there will be further comments. Jan
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > > of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it > fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far. > Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a > managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a > reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node. > > As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot > simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the > new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period. It looks like it might be possible to split this into three or four patches: 1) Factor __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() out of of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() 2) Add struct device * argument 3) Convert pr_info() to dev_info() 4) Add devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > --- > drivers/pci/of.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > include/linux/of_pci.h | 14 ++++++-- > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c > index a28355c273ae..6eab0bde2ab3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/of.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c > @@ -243,26 +243,8 @@ void of_pci_check_probe_only(void) > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_check_probe_only); > > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) > -/** > - * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT > - * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property > - * @busno: bus number associated with the bridge root bus > - * @bus_max: maximum number of buses for this bridge > - * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing > - * @io_base: pointer to a variable that will contain on return the physical > - * address for the start of the I/O range. Can be NULL if the caller doesn't > - * expect I/O ranges to be present in the device tree. > - * > - * It is the caller's job to free the @resources list. > - * > - * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device > - * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected > - * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document. > - * > - * It returns zero if the range parsing has been successful or a standard error > - * value if it failed. > - */ > -int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > +static int __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > + struct device_node *dev_node, > unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > { > @@ -277,19 +259,22 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > if (io_base) > *io_base = (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR; > > - bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (dev) > + bus_range = devm_kzalloc(dev,sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); > + else > + bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!bus_range) > return -ENOMEM; > > - pr_info("host bridge %pOF ranges:\n", dev); > + pr_info("host bridge %pOF ranges:\n", dev_node); Since you now have a struct device *, maybe convert these to dev_info()? It looks like __dev_printk() does something sensible if "dev" is NULL. > > - err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, bus_range); > + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev_node, bus_range); > if (err) { > bus_range->start = busno; > bus_range->end = bus_max; > bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS; > pr_info(" No bus range found for %pOF, using %pR\n", > - dev, bus_range); > + dev_node, bus_range); > } else { > if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + bus_max) > bus_range->end = bus_range->start + bus_max; > @@ -297,7 +282,7 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > pci_add_resource(resources, bus_range); > > /* Check for ranges property */ > - err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev); > + err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev_node); > if (err) > goto parse_failed; > > @@ -321,13 +306,17 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0) > continue; > > - res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (dev) > + res = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct resource), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + else > + res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!res) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto parse_failed; > } > > - err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res); > + err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev_node, res); > if (err) { > kfree(res); > continue; > @@ -336,13 +325,13 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO) { > if (!io_base) { > pr_err("I/O range found for %pOF. Please provide an io_base pointer to save CPU base address\n", > - dev); > + dev_node); > err = -EINVAL; > goto conversion_failed; > } > if (*io_base != (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR) > pr_warn("More than one I/O resource converted for %pOF. CPU base address for old range lost!\n", > - dev); > + dev_node); > *io_base = range.cpu_addr; > } > > @@ -354,12 +343,50 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > conversion_failed: > kfree(res); > parse_failed: > - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > - kfree(window->res); > + if (!dev); > + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > + kfree(window->res); > pci_free_resource_list(resources); > return err; > } > + > +/** > + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT > + * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property > + * @busno: bus number associated with the bridge root bus > + * @bus_max: maximum number of buses for this bridge > + * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing > + * @io_base: pointer to a variable that will contain on return the physical > + * address for the start of the I/O range. Can be NULL if the caller doesn't > + * expect I/O ranges to be present in the device tree. > + * > + * It is the caller's job to free the @resources list. > + * > + * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device > + * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected > + * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document. > + * > + * It returns zero if the range parsing has been successful or a standard error > + * value if it failed. > + */ > +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > +{ > + return __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(NULL, dev_node, busno, > + bus_max, resources, io_base); > +} > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources); > + > +int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > +{ > + return __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(dev, dev->of_node, busno, > + bus_max, resources, io_base); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources); > + > #endif /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */ > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h > index 091033a6b836..08b8f02426a5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of_pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h > @@ -71,11 +71,21 @@ of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin) > #endif > > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) > -int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base); > +int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base); > #else > -static inline int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, > +static inline int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, > + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +static inline int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, > struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) > { > -- > 2.13.6 >
On 2018-04-28 00:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> >> >> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it >> fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far. >> Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a >> managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a >> reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node. >> >> As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot >> simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the >> new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period. > > It looks like it might be possible to split this into three or four > patches: > > 1) Factor __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() out of > of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() > > 2) Add struct device * argument > > 3) Convert pr_info() to dev_info() > > 4) Add devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() Will do. I'm even considering 5) mark of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() __deprecated, due to the leak and no remaining in-tree user - what do you think? Jan
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2018-04-28 00:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > >> > >> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it > >> fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far. > >> Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a > >> managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a > >> reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node. > >> > >> As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot > >> simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the > >> new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period. > > > > It looks like it might be possible to split this into three or four > > patches: > > > > 1) Factor __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() out of > > of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() > > > > 2) Add struct device * argument > > > > 3) Convert pr_info() to dev_info() > > > > 4) Add devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() > > Will do. I'm even considering > > 5) mark of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() __deprecated, due to the leak > and no remaining in-tree user - what do you think? Sounds good. It'd be nice if we had some guideline about deprecation -- whether we actually need to mark things __deprecated, and then how long to wait before actually removing them, but I don't see anything in Documentation/. Looks like it was added by cbe4097f8ae6 ("of/pci: Add support for parsing PCI host bridge resources from DT") in v3.18, so it's been around for a while and I guess it would be nice to have a grace period before removing it.
On 4/30/2018 2:40 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2018-04-28 00:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> >>>> >>>> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it >>>> fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far. >>>> Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a >>>> managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a >>>> reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node. >>>> >>>> As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot >>>> simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the >>>> new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period. >>> >>> It looks like it might be possible to split this into three or four >>> patches: >>> >>> 1) Factor __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() out of >>> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() >>> >>> 2) Add struct device * argument >>> >>> 3) Convert pr_info() to dev_info() >>> >>> 4) Add devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() >> >> Will do. I'm even considering >> >> 5) mark of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() __deprecated, due to the leak >> and no remaining in-tree user - what do you think? > > Sounds good. > > It'd be nice if we had some guideline about deprecation -- whether we > actually need to mark things __deprecated, and then how long to wait > before actually removing them, but I don't see anything in > Documentation/. I'm under the impression that we don't quite care about out-of-tree drivers. I have seen many times out-of-tree drivers to be broken due to API changes, renames or even parameter meaning change. If the plan is to remove the API, just remove the API today. > > Looks like it was added by cbe4097f8ae6 ("of/pci: Add support for > parsing PCI host bridge resources from DT") in v3.18, so it's been > around for a while and I guess it would be nice to have a grace period > before removing it. >
On 2018-04-30 20:43, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 4/30/2018 2:40 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2018-04-28 00:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> >>>>> >>>>> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it >>>>> fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far. >>>>> Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a >>>>> managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a >>>>> reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node. >>>>> >>>>> As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot >>>>> simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the >>>>> new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period. >>>> >>>> It looks like it might be possible to split this into three or four >>>> patches: >>>> >>>> 1) Factor __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() out of >>>> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() >>>> >>>> 2) Add struct device * argument >>>> >>>> 3) Convert pr_info() to dev_info() >>>> >>>> 4) Add devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() >>> >>> Will do. I'm even considering >>> >>> 5) mark of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() __deprecated, due to the leak >>> and no remaining in-tree user - what do you think? >> >> Sounds good. >> >> It'd be nice if we had some guideline about deprecation -- whether we >> actually need to mark things __deprecated, and then how long to wait >> before actually removing them, but I don't see anything in >> Documentation/. > > I'm under the impression that we don't quite care about out-of-tree drivers. > I have seen many times out-of-tree drivers to be broken due to API changes, > renames or even parameter meaning change. > > If the plan is to remove the API, just remove the API today. I've already sent a __deprecated patch on Monday [1], in v2 of this series [2]. Please vote against that there, and I will replace it with a complete removal of that API. Thanks, Jan [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/30/22 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/30/24
diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c index a28355c273ae..6eab0bde2ab3 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/of.c +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c @@ -243,26 +243,8 @@ void of_pci_check_probe_only(void) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_check_probe_only); #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) -/** - * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT - * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property - * @busno: bus number associated with the bridge root bus - * @bus_max: maximum number of buses for this bridge - * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing - * @io_base: pointer to a variable that will contain on return the physical - * address for the start of the I/O range. Can be NULL if the caller doesn't - * expect I/O ranges to be present in the device tree. - * - * It is the caller's job to free the @resources list. - * - * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device - * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected - * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document. - * - * It returns zero if the range parsing has been successful or a standard error - * value if it failed. - */ -int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, +static int __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, + struct device_node *dev_node, unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) { @@ -277,19 +259,22 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, if (io_base) *io_base = (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR; - bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); + if (dev) + bus_range = devm_kzalloc(dev,sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); + else + bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL); if (!bus_range) return -ENOMEM; - pr_info("host bridge %pOF ranges:\n", dev); + pr_info("host bridge %pOF ranges:\n", dev_node); - err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, bus_range); + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev_node, bus_range); if (err) { bus_range->start = busno; bus_range->end = bus_max; bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS; pr_info(" No bus range found for %pOF, using %pR\n", - dev, bus_range); + dev_node, bus_range); } else { if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + bus_max) bus_range->end = bus_range->start + bus_max; @@ -297,7 +282,7 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, pci_add_resource(resources, bus_range); /* Check for ranges property */ - err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev); + err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev_node); if (err) goto parse_failed; @@ -321,13 +306,17 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0) continue; - res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); + if (dev) + res = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct resource), + GFP_KERNEL); + else + res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL); if (!res) { err = -ENOMEM; goto parse_failed; } - err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res); + err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev_node, res); if (err) { kfree(res); continue; @@ -336,13 +325,13 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO) { if (!io_base) { pr_err("I/O range found for %pOF. Please provide an io_base pointer to save CPU base address\n", - dev); + dev_node); err = -EINVAL; goto conversion_failed; } if (*io_base != (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR) pr_warn("More than one I/O resource converted for %pOF. CPU base address for old range lost!\n", - dev); + dev_node); *io_base = range.cpu_addr; } @@ -354,12 +343,50 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, conversion_failed: kfree(res); parse_failed: - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) - kfree(window->res); + if (!dev); + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) + kfree(window->res); pci_free_resource_list(resources); return err; } + +/** + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT + * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property + * @busno: bus number associated with the bridge root bus + * @bus_max: maximum number of buses for this bridge + * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing + * @io_base: pointer to a variable that will contain on return the physical + * address for the start of the I/O range. Can be NULL if the caller doesn't + * expect I/O ranges to be present in the device tree. + * + * It is the caller's job to free the @resources list. + * + * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device + * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected + * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document. + * + * It returns zero if the range parsing has been successful or a standard error + * value if it failed. + */ +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) +{ + return __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(NULL, dev_node, busno, + bus_max, resources, io_base); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources); + +int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) +{ + return __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(dev, dev->of_node, busno, + bus_max, resources, io_base); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources); + #endif /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */ /** diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h index 091033a6b836..08b8f02426a5 100644 --- a/include/linux/of_pci.h +++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h @@ -71,11 +71,21 @@ of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin) #endif #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) -int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base); +int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base); #else -static inline int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev, +static inline int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev_node, + unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +static inline int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max, struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base) {