From patchwork Fri Nov 15 20:57:41 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 13876844 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl (cloudserver094114.home.pl [79.96.170.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA36812F585; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.96.170.134 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731704477; cv=none; b=urnCNRoCWMmAIgIV6hvAsM9as3X2JQ1Co5ZOVcaksb957Ieb7rXupQQFqaL5iv+3h36PAzdZOo/7gsvyvzxFzZV3jgmc8Czj/SECy3AIDBbzs975RhVff8WWAeBxhfyv3+6Vjn6++uUZ2Vg4U+boX3BQ047hGDx2AexGnhX8AO0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731704477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rsn+RwiG0Uq2EfiVehR0Bd4Q9j5Z+jOh9GWo9JKzu9w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p/YDcTrY4jaZ6inAsDWxFeCHkbnht2nP/VBNJU7mV3MkCAeNpk+FUMe4oKxyBsTZPsyY5caDg4nhcFyFHklFay+j2AdfaYRpo2rM1/lTgO/kY12ezil+kWhII1PhIGJdzw9nLdE49QfsMdVjMwLnB3Ag/55fobIzyGhDUefxB1c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rjwysocki.net; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) header.d=rjwysocki.net header.i=@rjwysocki.net header.b=RC+iVSn9 reason="signature verification failed"; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.96.170.134 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rjwysocki.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=rjwysocki.net header.i=@rjwysocki.net header.b="RC+iVSn9" Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (HELO v370.home.net.pl) by /usr/run/smtp (/usr/run/postfix/private/idea_relay_lmtp) via UNIX with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 6.2.1) id fb68522096ef80c5; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:01:06 +0100 Received: from kreacher.localnet (unknown [195.136.19.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cloudserver094114.home.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A77EB851B10; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:01:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rjwysocki.net; s=dkim; t=1731704466; bh=rsn+RwiG0Uq2EfiVehR0Bd4Q9j5Z+jOh9GWo9JKzu9w=; h=From:Subject:Date; b=RC+iVSn9FP6QblHtHIh0ohYq30KmyFXkknXYdM7ru2rZTMecRI7YA574xcdhp38BW XXMpm4RvxLCwlSCxnUpVAJqzWoysngdKvSJ0OQAp7Rxow9+xaZ+Ae52wNUKMdfJ6DC apWvPZIoSJeVqI1i8AfCxxHwtYVBzOKNw/6TdCIWeXMzbBuFjkBjX+zVcvI+S/NFYT sfjZpn4vz2i9LhNTu0fxuYZOe9d8bLg/o/fu2kBH8LIv2jtyRyfPhihP22dHKPLrDH e7LSYL1kMu6z0gNrGZ3MroI8aUa9nkjV9dkOQuWXUS+yDj/xh2R5NKgeqIiIY1C+dK LRWuP1FM/eJ9w== From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM , Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , x86 Maintainers , Patryk Wlazlyn , "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Artem Bityutskiy , Mario Limonciello , Linux ACPI Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpuidle: Do not return from cpuidle_play_dead() on callback failures Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:57:41 +0100 Message-ID: <13636465.uLZWGnKmhe@rjwysocki.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CLIENT-IP: 195.136.19.94 X-CLIENT-HOSTNAME: 195.136.19.94 X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrvdeggddugeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecujffqoffgrffnpdggtffipffknecuuegrihhlohhuthemucduhedtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfgrfhgrvghlucflrdcuhgihshhotghkihdfuceorhhjfiesrhhjfiihshhotghkihdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeffhfdujeelhfdtgeffkeetudfhtefhhfeiteethfekvefgvdfgfeeikeeigfehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucfkphepudelhedrudefiedrudelrdelgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduleehrddufeeirdduledrleegpdhhvghlohepkhhrvggrtghhvghrrdhlohgtrghlnhgvthdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrjhifsehrjhifhihsohgtkhhirdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeelpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqphhmsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvthgvrhiisehinhhfrhgruggvrggurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqkhgvrhhnvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepgiekieeskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphgrthhrhihkrdiflhgriihlhihnsehlihh X-DCC--Metrics: v370.home.net.pl 0; Body=9 Fuz1=9 Fuz2=9 Hi Everyone, This series of 2 patches supersedes https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4992010.31r3eYUQgx@rjwysocki.net/ in order to address review feedback. Patch [1/2] modifies cpuidle_play_dead() as per the subject and patch [2/2] changes the :enter_dead() cpuidle state callback return type to void. Thanks!