| Message ID | 20190911130314.29973-1-qperret@qperret.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Make IPA use PM_EM | expand |
Hi Quentin, the series does no longer apply, do you think it is possible to give it a respin? On 11/09/2019 15:03, Quentin Perret wrote: > Re-sending this from an email address I can access. For a cover letter, > see: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190812084235.21440-1-quentin.perret@arm.com/ > > Changes in v8: > - Fixed checkpatch errors (Rui) > > Changes in v7 > - Added patch 02/04 to fix the build error reported by the kbuild bot > > Changes in v6 > - Added Daniel's and Viresh's Acked-by to all patches > > Changes in v5: > - Changed patch 02 to guard IPA-specific code in cpu_cooling.c with > appropriate ifdefery (Daniel) > - Rebased on 5.2-rc2 > > Changes in v4: > - Added Viresh's Acked-by to all 3 patches > - Improved commit message of patch 3/3 to explain how it has no > functional impact on existing users (Eduardo) > > Changes in v3: > - Changed warning message for unordered tables to something more > explicit (Viresh) > - Changed WARN() into a pr_err() for consistency > > Changes in v2: > - Fixed patch 01/03 to actually enable CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL > - Added "depends on ENERGY_MODEL" to IPA (Daniel) > - Added check to bail out if the freq table is unsorted (Viresh) > > > Quentin Perret (4): > arm64: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL > PM / EM: Declare EM data types unconditionally > thermal: cpu_cooling: Make the power-related code depend on IPA > thermal: cpu_cooling: Migrate to using the EM framework > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 427 ++++++++++++++-------------------- > include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +- > 4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 254 deletions(-) >
Hi Daniel, On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:35 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > the series does no longer apply, do you think it is possible to give it > a respin? Right, I'll try to fix the conflicts and post a v9 shortly. Thanks, Quentin
Hi Quentin, On 07/10/2019 15:37, Quentin Perret wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:35 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >> the series does no longer apply, do you think it is possible to give it >> a respin? > > Right, I'll try to fix the conflicts and post a v9 shortly. we are getting close to the merge window, did you have time to respin the series?
On Wednesday 30 Oct 2019 at 11:54:30 (+0100), Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Hi Quentin, > > On 07/10/2019 15:37, Quentin Perret wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:35 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > >> the series does no longer apply, do you think it is possible to give it > >> a respin? > > > > Right, I'll try to fix the conflicts and post a v9 shortly. > > we are getting close to the merge window, did you have time to respin > the series? Yes, sorry for the delay, but I have a 5.4-rc4-based branch that seems to work. I'll push that ASAP. Thanks, Quentin