Message ID | 20231206155740.5278-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to json-schema | expand |
On 06/12/2023 16:57, Biju Das wrote: > Convert the below bindings to json-schema > 1) DA906{1,2} mfd bindings > 2) DA906{1,2,3} onkey bindings > 3) DA906{1,2,3} thermal bindings > > Also add fallback for DA9061 watchdog device and document > DA9063 watchdog device. Please explain here dependencies and make clear merging strategy. The patches cannot be taken independently. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, Lee Jones, > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 8:38 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to json-schema > > On 06/12/2023 16:57, Biju Das wrote: > > Convert the below bindings to json-schema > > 1) DA906{1,2} mfd bindings > > 2) DA906{1,2,3} onkey bindings > > 3) DA906{1,2,3} thermal bindings > > > > Also add fallback for DA9061 watchdog device and document > > DA9063 watchdog device. > > Please explain here dependencies and make clear merging strategy. The > patches cannot be taken independently. Rob mentioned it needs to be taken through MFD tree. See [1] [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20231202192536.266885-9-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/#25620636 Cheers, Biju
On 07/12/2023 10:01, Biju Das wrote: > Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, Lee Jones, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 8:38 AM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to json-schema >> >> On 06/12/2023 16:57, Biju Das wrote: >>> Convert the below bindings to json-schema >>> 1) DA906{1,2} mfd bindings >>> 2) DA906{1,2,3} onkey bindings >>> 3) DA906{1,2,3} thermal bindings >>> >>> Also add fallback for DA9061 watchdog device and document >>> DA9063 watchdog device. >> >> Please explain here dependencies and make clear merging strategy. The >> patches cannot be taken independently. > > Rob mentioned it needs to be taken through MFD tree. See [1] > This I know, but you must explain it here - not in my reply, but in the cover letter. No one will remember what was agreed days ago, not mentioning that not everyone could read Rob's message. So how anyone reading your cover letter could know it? Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 9:16 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to json-schema > > On 07/12/2023 10:01, Biju Das wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, Lee Jones, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 8:38 AM > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to > >> json-schema > >> > >> On 06/12/2023 16:57, Biju Das wrote: > >>> Convert the below bindings to json-schema > >>> 1) DA906{1,2} mfd bindings > >>> 2) DA906{1,2,3} onkey bindings > >>> 3) DA906{1,2,3} thermal bindings > >>> > >>> Also add fallback for DA9061 watchdog device and document > >>> DA9063 watchdog device. > >> > >> Please explain here dependencies and make clear merging strategy. The > >> patches cannot be taken independently. > > > > Rob mentioned it needs to be taken through MFD tree. See [1] > > > > This I know, but you must explain it here - not in my reply, but in the > cover letter. No one will remember what was agreed days ago, not > mentioning that not everyone could read Rob's message. So how anyone > reading your cover letter could know it? Agreed, Will mention it in cover letter. Cheers, Biju