Message ID | 20240813095115.2078-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cpufreq/amd-pstate: A set of fixes | expand |
On 8/13/2024 04:51, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > Hello Rafael, Viresh, > > This series contains three fixes for the amd-pstate driver for 6.11. > Could you please include it in your tree? > > These patches are based on linux-pm/master with the top commit > 7c626ce4bae1 ("Linux 6.11-rc3"). > > There are three patches, > > 1. To fix an uninitialized variable in amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() > from Dan Carpenter: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ff53543-6c04-48a0-8d99-7dc010b93b3a@stanley.mountain/ > > 2. Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of > topology_logical_die_id() definition of the later function has > changed on some AMD processors since the inclusion of the CPUID > 0x80000026 parser: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240801124509.3650-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com/ > > 3. Remove a warning for the absence fo X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and > Zen2 since they don't have the feature defined. This fixes the > regression reported by David Wang: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240730140111.4491-1-00107082@163.com/ > > Thanks and Regards > gautham. > > Dan Carpenter (1): > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix uninitialized variable in > amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() > > Gautham R. Shenoy (2): > cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of > logical_die_id() > cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and > Zen2 > > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > Thanks for handling these. I'm back now, I'm digging through my inbox. Assuming Rafael didn't already pull these I'll batch these into my amd-pstate branch for the robots to bang on and then send a PR after I go through everything else that happened.
Hello Mario, On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:41:30PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > On 8/13/2024 04:51, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > Hello Rafael, Viresh, > > > > This series contains three fixes for the amd-pstate driver for 6.11. > > Could you please include it in your tree? > > > > These patches are based on linux-pm/master with the top commit > > 7c626ce4bae1 ("Linux 6.11-rc3"). > > > > There are three patches, > > > > 1. To fix an uninitialized variable in amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() > > from Dan Carpenter: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ff53543-6c04-48a0-8d99-7dc010b93b3a@stanley.mountain/ > > > > 2. Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of > > topology_logical_die_id() definition of the later function has > > changed on some AMD processors since the inclusion of the CPUID > > 0x80000026 parser: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240801124509.3650-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com/ > > > > 3. Remove a warning for the absence fo X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and > > Zen2 since they don't have the feature defined. This fixes the > > regression reported by David Wang: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240730140111.4491-1-00107082@163.com/ > > > > Thanks and Regards > > gautham. > > > > Dan Carpenter (1): > > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix uninitialized variable in > > amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() > > > > Gautham R. Shenoy (2): > > cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of > > logical_die_id() > > cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and > > Zen2 > > > > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 ++++------ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > Thanks for handling these. I'm back now, I'm digging through my inbox. > Assuming Rafael didn't already pull these I'll batch these into my > amd-pstate branch for the robots to bang on and then send a PR after I go > through everything else that happened. Thank you Mario. I will be sending an updated version to Patch 3 "Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and Zen2" to incorporate feedback from Xiaojian. Please merge the Patches 1 and 2 from this series. -- Thanks and Regards gautham.
On 8/22/2024 23:13, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > Hello Mario, > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:41:30PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: >> On 8/13/2024 04:51, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: >>> Hello Rafael, Viresh, >>> >>> This series contains three fixes for the amd-pstate driver for 6.11. >>> Could you please include it in your tree? >>> >>> These patches are based on linux-pm/master with the top commit >>> 7c626ce4bae1 ("Linux 6.11-rc3"). >>> >>> There are three patches, >>> >>> 1. To fix an uninitialized variable in amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() >>> from Dan Carpenter: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ff53543-6c04-48a0-8d99-7dc010b93b3a@stanley.mountain/ >>> >>> 2. Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of >>> topology_logical_die_id() definition of the later function has >>> changed on some AMD processors since the inclusion of the CPUID >>> 0x80000026 parser: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240801124509.3650-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com/ >>> >>> 3. Remove a warning for the absence fo X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and >>> Zen2 since they don't have the feature defined. This fixes the >>> regression reported by David Wang: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240730140111.4491-1-00107082@163.com/ > >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> gautham. >>> >>> Dan Carpenter (1): >>> cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix uninitialized variable in >>> amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() >>> >>> Gautham R. Shenoy (2): >>> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of >>> logical_die_id() >>> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and >>> Zen2 >>> >>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 ++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Thanks for handling these. I'm back now, I'm digging through my inbox. >> Assuming Rafael didn't already pull these I'll batch these into my >> amd-pstate branch for the robots to bang on and then send a PR after I go >> through everything else that happened. > > Thank you Mario. I will be sending an updated version to Patch 3 > "Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and Zen2" to incorporate > feedback from Xiaojian. > > Please merge the Patches 1 and 2 from this series. > Thanks, they're staged with the other fixes that were on the list. Will wait for your updated patch 3 for the fixes PR.