From patchwork Mon Dec 17 11:19:27 2018
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
X-Patchwork-Id: 10733153
Return-Path: <linux-pm-owner@kernel.org>
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
 [172.30.200.125])
	by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64F114E2
	for <patchwork-linux-pm@patchwork.kernel.org>;
 Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:24:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA16629B7B
	for <patchwork-linux-pm@patchwork.kernel.org>;
 Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:24:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
	id CE60329B81; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:24:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973C729B81
	for <patchwork-linux-pm@patchwork.kernel.org>;
 Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:24:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1731725AbeLQLYJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;patchwork-linux-pm@patchwork.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:24:09 -0500
Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:48565 "EHLO
        cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727220AbeLQLYI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:24:08 -0500
Received: from 79.184.255.25.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.255.25) (HELO
 aspire.rjw.lan)
 by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.183)
 id f2bbb1051b951c52; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:24:06 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFT][PATCH 0/2] ACPI / PM: Avoid spurious wakeups from non-wakeup
 GPEs in suspend-to-idle
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:19:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4307523.O7RPX2KSmk@aspire.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-pm.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP

Hi All,

It turns out that on some systems non-wakeup GPEs cause trouble (see the
changelog of patch [1/2]), so they better should be disabled during
suspend-to-idle (at least before entering the main loop of it).  This
is done in patch [1/2].

Patch [2/2] is just a folllow-up.

Thanks,
Rafael
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>