Message ID | 04278747-41fe-3a0a-81bf-2935efaafac0@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] PM: hibernate: defer device probing when resuming from hibernation | expand |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 7:51 AM Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote: > > syzbot is reporting hung task at misc_open() [1], for there is a race > window of AB-BA deadlock which involves probe_count variable. Currently > wait_for_device_probe() from snapshot_open() from misc_open() can sleep > forever with misc_mtx held if probe_count cannot become 0. > > When a device is probed by hub_event() work function, probe_count is > incremented before the probe function starts, and probe_count is > decremented after the probe function completed. > > There are three cases that can prevent probe_count from dropping to 0. > > (a) A device being probed stopped responding (i.e. broken/malicious > hardware). > > (b) A process emulating a USB device using /dev/raw-gadget interface > stopped responding for some reason. > > (c) New device probe requests keeps coming in before existing device > probe requests complete. > > The phenomenon syzbot is reporting is (b). A process which is holding > system_transition_mutex and misc_mtx is waiting for probe_count to become > 0 inside wait_for_device_probe(), but the probe function which is called > from hub_event() work function is waiting for the processes which are > blocked at mutex_lock(&misc_mtx) to respond via /dev/raw-gadget interface. > > This patch mitigates (b) by deferring wait_for_device_probe() from > snapshot_open() to snapshot_write() and snapshot_ioctl(). Please note that > the possibility of (b) remains as long as any thread which is emulating a > USB device via /dev/raw-gadget interface can be blocked by uninterruptible > blocking operations (e.g. mutex_lock()). > > Please also note that (a) and (c) are not addressed. Regarding (c), we > should change the code to wait for only one device which contains the > image for resuming from hibernation. I don't know how to address (a), for > use of timeout for wait_for_device_probe() might result in loss of user > data in the image. Maybe we should require the userland to wait for the > image device before opening /dev/snapshot interface. > > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=358c9ab4c93da7b7238c [1] > Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+358c9ab4c93da7b7238c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+358c9ab4c93da7b7238c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> > Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> > --- > Changes in v3: > Defer wait_for_device_probe() till first write()/ioctl() request. > > v2 is at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/03096156-3478-db03-c015-28643479116c@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp . > > v1 is at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/72e74af9-f1b6-e383-a2c3-6ee8a0aea5e0@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp . > > kernel/power/user.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c > index ad241b4ff64c..d43c2aa583b2 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/user.c > +++ b/kernel/power/user.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #include "power.h" > > +static bool need_wait; > > static struct snapshot_data { > struct snapshot_handle handle; > @@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > * Resuming. We may need to wait for the image device to > * appear. > */ > - wait_for_device_probe(); > + need_wait = true; > > data->swap = -1; > data->mode = O_WRONLY; > @@ -168,6 +169,11 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, > ssize_t res; > loff_t pg_offp = *offp & ~PAGE_MASK; > > + if (need_wait) { > + wait_for_device_probe(); > + need_wait = false; > + } > + > lock_system_sleep(); > > data = filp->private_data; > @@ -244,6 +250,11 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, > loff_t size; > sector_t offset; > > + if (need_wait) { > + wait_for_device_probe(); > + need_wait = false; > + } > + > if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC) > return -ENOTTY; > if (_IOC_NR(cmd) > SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAXNR) > -- Applied as 5.20 material, thanks!
diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c index ad241b4ff64c..d43c2aa583b2 100644 --- a/kernel/power/user.c +++ b/kernel/power/user.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include "power.h" +static bool need_wait; static struct snapshot_data { struct snapshot_handle handle; @@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) * Resuming. We may need to wait for the image device to * appear. */ - wait_for_device_probe(); + need_wait = true; data->swap = -1; data->mode = O_WRONLY; @@ -168,6 +169,11 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, ssize_t res; loff_t pg_offp = *offp & ~PAGE_MASK; + if (need_wait) { + wait_for_device_probe(); + need_wait = false; + } + lock_system_sleep(); data = filp->private_data; @@ -244,6 +250,11 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, loff_t size; sector_t offset; + if (need_wait) { + wait_for_device_probe(); + need_wait = false; + } + if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC) return -ENOTTY; if (_IOC_NR(cmd) > SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAXNR)