diff mbox

[2/2] staging: ti-soc-thermal: remove external heat while extrapolating hotspot

Message ID 1363986787-28147-3-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Zhang Rui
Headers show

Commit Message

Eduardo Valentin March 22, 2013, 9:13 p.m. UTC
For boards that provide a PCB sensor close to SoC junction
temperature, it is possible to remove the cumulative heat
reported by the SoC temperature sensor.

This patch changes the extrapolation computation to consider
an external sensor in the extrapolation equations.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
---
 drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Zhang Rui March 25, 2013, 6:23 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:13 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> For boards that provide a PCB sensor close to SoC junction
> temperature, it is possible to remove the cumulative heat
> reported by the SoC temperature sensor.
> 
> This patch changes the extrapolation computation to consider
> an external sensor in the extrapolation equations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> index 231c549..52d3c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> @@ -92,10 +92,9 @@ static inline int ti_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	pcb_temp = 0;
> -	/* TODO: Introduce pcb temperature lookup */
> +	ret = thermal_zone_lookup_temperature("pcb", &pcb_temp);
>  	/* In case pcb zone is available, use the extrapolation rule with it */
> -	if (pcb_temp) {
> +	if (!ret) {
>  		tmp -= pcb_temp;
>  		slope = s->slope_pcb;
>  		constant = s->constant_pcb;

I can not see this piece of code.
But I assume that the thermal_zone_device is registered in another
driver, right?
or else you can use the thermal_zone_device pointer directly instead.

thanks,
rui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eduardo Valentin March 25, 2013, 11:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On 25-03-2013 02:23, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:13 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> For boards that provide a PCB sensor close to SoC junction
>> temperature, it is possible to remove the cumulative heat
>> reported by the SoC temperature sensor.
>>
>> This patch changes the extrapolation computation to consider
>> an external sensor in the extrapolation equations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |    5 ++---
>>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
>> index 231c549..52d3c1b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
>> @@ -92,10 +92,9 @@ static inline int ti_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>
>> -	pcb_temp = 0;
>> -	/* TODO: Introduce pcb temperature lookup */
>> +	ret = thermal_zone_lookup_temperature("pcb", &pcb_temp);
>>   	/* In case pcb zone is available, use the extrapolation rule with it */
>> -	if (pcb_temp) {
>> +	if (!ret) {
>>   		tmp -= pcb_temp;
>>   		slope = s->slope_pcb;
>>   		constant = s->constant_pcb;
>
> I can not see this piece of code.
> But I assume that the thermal_zone_device is registered in another
> driver, right?

It is because I made this patch based on staging-next. But you will find 
the same under drivers/stating/omap-thermal/omap-bandgap.c


Yes. The sensor managed by another driver. And the temperature lookup is 
assumed to be done by the fw.

> or else you can use the thermal_zone_device pointer directly instead.
>

I'd not recommend this because of the above statements

> thanks,
> rui
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
index 231c549..52d3c1b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
@@ -92,10 +92,9 @@  static inline int ti_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	pcb_temp = 0;
-	/* TODO: Introduce pcb temperature lookup */
+	ret = thermal_zone_lookup_temperature("pcb", &pcb_temp);
 	/* In case pcb zone is available, use the extrapolation rule with it */
-	if (pcb_temp) {
+	if (!ret) {
 		tmp -= pcb_temp;
 		slope = s->slope_pcb;
 		constant = s->constant_pcb;