@@ -1689,21 +1689,24 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_propagate_rate_change(struct clk_core *clk,
* walk down a subtree and set the new rates notifying the rate
* change on the way
*/
-static void clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *clk)
+static void
+clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *clk, unsigned long best_parent_rate)
{
struct clk_core *child;
struct hlist_node *tmp;
unsigned long old_rate;
- unsigned long best_parent_rate = 0;
bool skip_set_rate = false;
struct clk_core *old_parent;
- old_rate = clk->rate;
+ hlist_for_each_entry(child, &clk->children, child_node) {
+ /* Skip children who will be reparented to another clock */
+ if (child->new_parent && child->new_parent != clk)
+ continue;
+ if (child->new_rate > child->rate)
+ clk_change_rate(child, clk->new_rate);
+ }
- if (clk->new_parent)
- best_parent_rate = clk->new_parent->rate;
- else if (clk->parent)
- best_parent_rate = clk->parent->rate;
+ old_rate = clk->rate;
if (clk->new_parent && clk->new_parent != clk->parent) {
old_parent = __clk_set_parent_before(clk, clk->new_parent);
@@ -1723,7 +1726,7 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *clk)
if (!skip_set_rate && clk->ops->set_rate)
clk->ops->set_rate(clk->hw, clk->new_rate, best_parent_rate);
- clk->rate = clk_recalc(clk, best_parent_rate);
+ clk->rate = clk->new_rate;
if (clk->notifier_count && old_rate != clk->rate)
__clk_notify(clk, POST_RATE_CHANGE, old_rate, clk->rate);
@@ -1736,12 +1739,13 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *clk)
/* Skip children who will be reparented to another clock */
if (child->new_parent && child->new_parent != clk)
continue;
- clk_change_rate(child);
+ if (child->new_rate != child->rate)
+ clk_change_rate(child, clk->new_rate);
}
/* handle the new child who might not be in clk->children yet */
- if (clk->new_child)
- clk_change_rate(clk->new_child);
+ if (clk->new_child && clk->new_child->new_rate != clk->new_child->rate)
+ clk_change_rate(clk->new_child, clk->new_rate);
}
static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *clk,
@@ -1750,6 +1754,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *clk,
struct clk_core *top, *fail_clk;
unsigned long rate = req_rate;
int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long parent_rate;
if (!clk)
return 0;
@@ -1775,8 +1780,13 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *clk,
return -EBUSY;
}
+ if (top->parent)
+ parent_rate = top->parent->rate;
+ else
+ parent_rate = 0;
+
/* change the rates */
- clk_change_rate(top);
+ clk_change_rate(top, parent_rate);
clk->req_rate = req_rate;
If a clock is on and we call clk_set_rate() on it we may get into a situation where the clock temporarily increases in rate dramatically while we walk the tree and call .set_rate() ops. For example, consider a case where a PLL feeds into a divider. Initially the divider is set to divide by 1 and the PLL is running fairly slow (100MHz). The downstream consumer of the divider output can only handle rates =< 400 MHz, but the divider can only choose between divisors of 1 and 4. +-----+ +----------------+ | PLL |-->| div 1 or div 4 |---> consumer device +-----+ +----------------+ To achieve a rate of 400MHz on the output of the divider, we would have to set the rate of the PLL to 1.6 GHz and then divide it by 4. The current code would set the PLL to 1.6GHz first while the divider is still set to 1, thus causing the downstream consumer of the clock to receive a few clock cycles of 1.6GHz clock (far beyond it's maximum acceptable rate). We should be changing the divider first before increasing the PLL rate to avoid this problem. Therefore, set the rate of any child clocks that are increasing in rate from their current rate so that they can increase their dividers if necessary. We assume that there isn't such a thing as minimum rate requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)