| Message ID | 1430729652-14813-7-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
| Headers | show |
On 05/04/2015 02:24 PM, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote: > If frequency is throttled due to OCC reset then cpus will be in Psafe > frequency, so restore the frequency on all cpus to policy->cur when > OCCs are active again. And if frequency is throttled due to Pmax > capping then restore the frequency of all the cpus in the chip on > unthrottling. > > Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c > index 0a59d5b..b2915bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static struct chip { > bool throttled; > cpumask_t mask; > struct work_struct throttle; > + bool restore; > } *chips; > > static int nr_chips; > @@ -418,9 +419,29 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = { > void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle); > + unsigned int cpu; > + cpumask_var_t mask; > > smp_call_function_any(&chip->mask, > powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check, NULL, 0); > + > + if (!chip->restore) > + return; > + > + chip->restore = false; > + cpumask_copy(mask, &chip->mask); > + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) { > + int index, tcpu; > + struct cpufreq_policy policy; > + > + cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu); > + cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.freq_table, > + policy.cur, > + CPUFREQ_RELATION_C, &index); > + powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index); > + for_each_cpu(tcpu, policy.cpus) > + cpumask_clear_cpu(tcpu, mask); > + } > } > > static char throttle_reason[][30] = { > @@ -473,8 +494,10 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block *nb, > throttled = false; > pr_info("OCC: Active\n"); > > - for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) > + for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) { > + chips[i].restore = true; > schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle); > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -490,8 +513,11 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block *nb, > return 0; > > for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) > - if (chips[i].id == chip_id) > + if (chips[i].id == chip_id) { > + if (!reason) > + chips[i].restore = true; > schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle); > + } > } > return 0; > } > @@ -545,6 +571,7 @@ static int init_chip_info(void) > chips[i].throttled = false; > cpumask_copy(&chips[i].mask, cpumask_of_node(chip[i])); > INIT_WORK(&chips[i].throttle, powernv_cpufreq_work_fn); > + chips[i].restore = false; > } > > return 0; > Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c index 0a59d5b..b2915bc 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static struct chip { bool throttled; cpumask_t mask; struct work_struct throttle; + bool restore; } *chips; static int nr_chips; @@ -418,9 +419,29 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = { void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) { struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle); + unsigned int cpu; + cpumask_var_t mask; smp_call_function_any(&chip->mask, powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check, NULL, 0); + + if (!chip->restore) + return; + + chip->restore = false; + cpumask_copy(mask, &chip->mask); + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) { + int index, tcpu; + struct cpufreq_policy policy; + + cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu); + cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.freq_table, + policy.cur, + CPUFREQ_RELATION_C, &index); + powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index); + for_each_cpu(tcpu, policy.cpus) + cpumask_clear_cpu(tcpu, mask); + } } static char throttle_reason[][30] = { @@ -473,8 +494,10 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block *nb, throttled = false; pr_info("OCC: Active\n"); - for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) + for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) { + chips[i].restore = true; schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle); + } return 0; } @@ -490,8 +513,11 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block *nb, return 0; for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) - if (chips[i].id == chip_id) + if (chips[i].id == chip_id) { + if (!reason) + chips[i].restore = true; schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle); + } } return 0; } @@ -545,6 +571,7 @@ static int init_chip_info(void) chips[i].throttled = false; cpumask_copy(&chips[i].mask, cpumask_of_node(chip[i])); INIT_WORK(&chips[i].throttle, powernv_cpufreq_work_fn); + chips[i].restore = false; } return 0;
If frequency is throttled due to OCC reset then cpus will be in Psafe frequency, so restore the frequency on all cpus to policy->cur when OCCs are active again. And if frequency is throttled due to Pmax capping then restore the frequency of all the cpus in the chip on unthrottling. Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)