Message ID | 1436293469-25707-35-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | RFC |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -7569,6 +7569,13 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env) > return 1; > } > > + if ((capacity_of(env->src_cpu) < capacity_of(env->dst_cpu)) && > + env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_running == 1 && > + cpu_overutilized(env->src_cpu) && > + !cpu_overutilized(env->dst_cpu)) { > + return 1; > + } > + > return unlikely(sd->nr_balance_failed > sd->cache_nice_tries+2); > } Doesn't this allow for a nice game of ping-pong? Where if a task runs on CPU X and generates interrupts there, its capacity will lower and we'll migrate it over to CPU Y because that isn't receiving interrupts. Now the task is running on Y, will generate interrupts there, and sees X as a more attractive destination. goto 1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 48ecf02..97eb83e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -7569,6 +7569,13 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env) return 1; } + if ((capacity_of(env->src_cpu) < capacity_of(env->dst_cpu)) && + env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_running == 1 && + cpu_overutilized(env->src_cpu) && + !cpu_overutilized(env->dst_cpu)) { + return 1; + } + return unlikely(sd->nr_balance_failed > sd->cache_nice_tries+2); } @@ -7923,7 +7930,8 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq); if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost || - !this_rq->rd->overload) { + (!energy_aware() && !this_rq->rd->overload) || + (energy_aware() && !this_rq->rd->overutilized)) { rcu_read_lock(); sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq->sd); if (sd)