@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <asm/cputhreads.h>
#include <asm/firmware.h>
@@ -423,18 +424,19 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
unsigned int cpu;
- cpumask_var_t mask;
+ cpumask_t mask;
- smp_call_function_any(&chip->mask,
+ get_online_cpus();
+ cpumask_and(&mask, &chip->mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ smp_call_function_any(&mask,
powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check, NULL, 0);
if (!chip->restore)
- return;
+ goto out;
chip->restore = false;
- cpumask_copy(mask, &chip->mask);
- for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) {
- int index, tcpu;
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
+ int index;
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
@@ -442,9 +444,10 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
policy.cur,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_C, &index);
powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
- for_each_cpu(tcpu, policy.cpus)
- cpumask_clear_cpu(tcpu, mask);
+ cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
}
+out:
+ put_online_cpus();
}
static char throttle_reason[][30] = {
In the kworker_thread powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(), we can end up sending an IPI to a cpu going offline. This is a rare corner case which is fixed using {get/put}_online_cpus(). Along with this fix, this patch adds changes to do oneshot cpumask_{clear/and} operation. Suggested-by: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Suggested-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- No changes from v7. drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)