diff mbox series

[V2,1/2] sched: Factor out nr_iowait and nr_iowait_cpu

Message ID 1538654644-32705-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined
Delegated to: Rafael Wysocki
Headers show
Series [V2,1/2] sched: Factor out nr_iowait and nr_iowait_cpu | expand

Commit Message

Daniel Lezcano Oct. 4, 2018, 12:04 p.m. UTC
The function nr_iowait_cpu() can be used directly by nr_iowait() instead
of duplicating code.

Call nr_iowait_cpu() from nr_iowait()

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Zijlstra Oct. 12, 2018, 8:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The function nr_iowait_cpu() can be used directly by nr_iowait() instead
> of duplicating code.
> 
> Call nr_iowait_cpu() from nr_iowait()
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Rafael J. Wysocki Oct. 26, 2018, 9:22 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 2:04:02 PM CEST Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The function nr_iowait_cpu() can be used directly by nr_iowait() instead
> of duplicating code.
> 
> Call nr_iowait_cpu() from nr_iowait()
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 625bc98..43efb74 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2875,6 +2875,25 @@ unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Consumers of these two interfaces, like for example the cpufreq menu
> + * governor are using nonsensical data. Boosting frequency for a CPU that has
> + * IO-wait which might not even end up running the task when it does become
> + * runnable.
> + */
> +
> +unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return atomic_read(&cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_iowait);
> +}
> +
> +void get_iowait_load(unsigned long *nr_waiters, unsigned long *load)
> +{
> +	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> +	*nr_waiters = atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait);
> +	*load = rq->load.weight;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * IO-wait accounting, and how its mostly bollocks (on SMP).
>   *
>   * The idea behind IO-wait account is to account the idle time that we could
> @@ -2909,31 +2928,11 @@ unsigned long nr_iowait(void)
>  	unsigned long i, sum = 0;
>  
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> -		sum += atomic_read(&cpu_rq(i)->nr_iowait);
> +		sum += nr_iowait_cpu(i);
>  
>  	return sum;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Consumers of these two interfaces, like for example the cpufreq menu
> - * governor are using nonsensical data. Boosting frequency for a CPU that has
> - * IO-wait which might not even end up running the task when it does become
> - * runnable.
> - */
> -
> -unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
> -{
> -	struct rq *this = cpu_rq(cpu);
> -	return atomic_read(&this->nr_iowait);
> -}
> -
> -void get_iowait_load(unsigned long *nr_waiters, unsigned long *load)
> -{
> -	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> -	*nr_waiters = atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait);
> -	*load = rq->load.weight;
> -}
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  
>  /*
> 

Both [1-2/2] applied with Peter's ACKs, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 625bc98..43efb74 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2875,6 +2875,25 @@  unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Consumers of these two interfaces, like for example the cpufreq menu
+ * governor are using nonsensical data. Boosting frequency for a CPU that has
+ * IO-wait which might not even end up running the task when it does become
+ * runnable.
+ */
+
+unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_iowait);
+}
+
+void get_iowait_load(unsigned long *nr_waiters, unsigned long *load)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+	*nr_waiters = atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait);
+	*load = rq->load.weight;
+}
+
+/*
  * IO-wait accounting, and how its mostly bollocks (on SMP).
  *
  * The idea behind IO-wait account is to account the idle time that we could
@@ -2909,31 +2928,11 @@  unsigned long nr_iowait(void)
 	unsigned long i, sum = 0;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
-		sum += atomic_read(&cpu_rq(i)->nr_iowait);
+		sum += nr_iowait_cpu(i);
 
 	return sum;
 }
 
-/*
- * Consumers of these two interfaces, like for example the cpufreq menu
- * governor are using nonsensical data. Boosting frequency for a CPU that has
- * IO-wait which might not even end up running the task when it does become
- * runnable.
- */
-
-unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
-{
-	struct rq *this = cpu_rq(cpu);
-	return atomic_read(&this->nr_iowait);
-}
-
-void get_iowait_load(unsigned long *nr_waiters, unsigned long *load)
-{
-	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
-	*nr_waiters = atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait);
-	*load = rq->load.weight;
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
 /*