Message ID | 1940908.mNKd7HXT40@aspire.rjw.lan (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined |
Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
Headers | show |
Series | cpuidle: menu: Fixes, optimizations and cleanups | expand |
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:45:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > It is not necessary to update data->last_state_idx in menu_select() > as it only is used in menu_update() which only runs when > data->needs_update is set and that is set only when updating > data->last_state_idx in menu_reflect(). > > Accordingly, drop the update of data->last_state_idx from > menu_select() and get rid of the (now redundant) "out" label > from it. > > No intentional behavior changes. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr s->target_residency <= ktime_to_us(delta_next)) idx = i; - goto out; + return idx; } if (s->exit_latency > latency_req) { /* @@ -445,10 +445,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr } } -out: - data->last_state_idx = idx; - - return data->last_state_idx; + return idx; } /**