| Message ID | 20140310203650.10746.63031.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c index 1f96f93..556eaf2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c @@ -393,9 +393,13 @@ static int __init vsyscall_init(void) { BUG_ON(VSYSCALL_ADDR(0) != __fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_FIRST_PAGE)); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); + on_each_cpu(cpu_vsyscall_init, NULL, 1); /* notifier priority > KVM */ - hotcpu_notifier(cpu_vsyscall_notifier, 30); + __hotcpu_notifier(cpu_vsyscall_notifier, 30); + + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; }
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the vsyscall code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html