From patchwork Tue May 23 08:53:47 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Juri Lelli X-Patchwork-Id: 9742151 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4750F60380 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 08:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A922873C for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 08:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 2C94D287B4; Tue, 23 May 2017 08:55:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9AD2873C for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 08:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936710AbdEWIy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2017 04:54:57 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48170 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967029AbdEWIyw (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2017 04:54:52 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF535164F; Tue, 23 May 2017 01:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com (e106622-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.211.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5479E3F53D; Tue, 23 May 2017 01:54:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Juri Lelli To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, andresoportus@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Subject: [PATCH RFC 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 09:53:47 +0100 Message-Id: <20170523085351.18586-5-juri.lelli@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20170523085351.18586-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> References: <20170523085351.18586-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP To be able to treat utilization signals of different scheduling classes in different ways (e.g., CFS signal might be stale while DEADLINE signal is never stale by design) we need to split sugov_cpu::util signal in two: util_cfs and util_dl. This patch does that by also changing sugov_get_util() parameter list. After this change aggregation of the different signals has to be performed by sugov_get_util() users (so that they can decide what to do with the different signals). Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Viresh Kumar Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Claudio Scordino --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 23 +++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 1508109c7f19..f930cec4c3d4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ struct sugov_cpu { u64 last_update; /* The fields below are only needed when sharing a policy. */ - unsigned long util; + unsigned long util_cfs; + unsigned long util_dl; unsigned long max; unsigned int flags; @@ -157,14 +158,13 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq); } -static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max) +static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { struct rq *rq = this_rq(); - unsigned long dl_util = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 20; - *max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id()); - - *util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg + dl_util, *max); + sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id()); + sg_cpu->util_cfs = rq->cfs.avg.util_avg; + sg_cpu->util_dl = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 20; } static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time, @@ -231,7 +231,9 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT) { next_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; } else { - sugov_get_util(&util, &max); + sugov_get_util(sg_cpu); + max = sg_cpu->max; + util = min(sg_cpu->util_cfs + sg_cpu->util_dl, max); sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, &util, &max); next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max); /* @@ -271,8 +273,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time) if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT) return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; - j_util = j_sg_cpu->util; j_max = j_sg_cpu->max; + j_util = min(j_sg_cpu->util_cfs + j_sg_cpu->util_dl, j_max); if (j_util * max > j_max * util) { util = j_util; max = j_max; @@ -289,15 +291,12 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, { struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = container_of(hook, struct sugov_cpu, update_util); struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy; - unsigned long util, max; unsigned int next_f; - sugov_get_util(&util, &max); raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock); - sg_cpu->util = util; - sg_cpu->max = max; + sugov_get_util(sg_cpu); sg_cpu->flags = flags; sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);