@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -67,10 +68,16 @@ static int ladder_select_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
struct ladder_device *ldev = this_cpu_ptr(&ladder_devices);
+ struct device *device = get_cpu_device(dev->cpu);
struct ladder_device_state *last_state;
int last_residency, last_idx = ldev->last_state_idx;
int first_idx = drv->states[0].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING ? 1 : 0;
int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
+ int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_raw_read_value(device);
+
+ /* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */
+ if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req)
+ latency_req = resume_latency;
/* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
if (unlikely(latency_req == 0)) {
Individual CPUs may have special requirements to not enter deep idle states. For example, a CPU running real time applications would not want to enter deep idle states to avoid latency impacts. At the same time other CPUs that do not have such a requirement could allow deep idle states to save power. This was already implemented in the menu governor. Implementing similar changes in the ladder governor which gets selected when CONFIG_NO_HZ and CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE are not set. Refer following commits for the menu governor changes. commit 9908859acaa9 ("cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration") commit 6dbf5cea05a7 ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid taking spinlock for accessing QoS values") Signed-off-by: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com> --- drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)