@@ -604,21 +604,21 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
}
- devfreq->min_freq = find_available_min_freq(devfreq);
- if (!devfreq->min_freq) {
+ devfreq->scaling_min_freq = find_available_min_freq(devfreq);
+ if (!devfreq->scaling_min_freq) {
mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -EINVAL;
goto err_dev;
}
- devfreq->scaling_min_freq = devfreq->min_freq;
+ devfreq->min_freq = devfreq->scaling_min_freq;
- devfreq->max_freq = find_available_max_freq(devfreq);
- if (!devfreq->max_freq) {
+ devfreq->scaling_max_freq = find_available_max_freq(devfreq);
+ if (!devfreq->scaling_max_freq) {
mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -EINVAL;
goto err_dev;
}
- devfreq->scaling_max_freq = devfreq->max_freq;
+ devfreq->max_freq = devfreq->scaling_max_freq;
dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d",
atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
Commit ab8f58ad72c4 ("PM / devfreq: Set min/max_freq when adding the devfreq device") introduced the initialization of the user limits min/max_freq from the lowest/highest available OPPs. Later commit f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the available min/max frequency") added scaling_min/max_freq, which actually represent the frequencies of the lowest/highest available OPP. scaling_min/ max_freq are initialized with the values from min/max_freq, which is totally correct in the context, but a bit awkward to read. Swap the initialization and assign scaling_min/max_freq with the OPP freqs and then the user limts min/max_freq with scaling_min/ max_freq. Needless to say that this change is a NOP, intended to improve readability. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> --- Changes in v2: - added 'Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>' tag drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)