| Message ID | 20180625151239.20976-23-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Delegated to: | Eduardo Valentin |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi index d5e8aedec188..b29c6405d214 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi @@ -7,4 +7,5 @@ #define PASTER(x, y) x ## y #define EVALUATOR(x, y) PASTER(x, y) #define CP110_LABEL(name) EVALUATOR(CP110_NAME, EVALUATOR(_, name)) +#define CP110_NODE_NAME(name) EVALUATOR(CP110_NAME, EVALUATOR(-, name)) #define ADDRESSIFY(addr) EVALUATOR(0x, addr)
Because the label is different between CPs, the full path of a node is unique. However, when referring to the end of the path only (the node name), this name is not unique anymore. The *thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() functions of the thermal core present this limitation and prevent having a thermal-zone per CP. Add a macro to make the distinction between node names to solve this situation. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)