Message ID | 20190208100554.32196-7-patrick.bellasi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add utilization clamping support | expand |
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:45AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 070caa1f72eb..8b282616e9c9 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct task_struct *p, > } > } > > -static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) > +static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p, bool reset) > { > unsigned int clamp_id; > > @@ -1080,6 +1080,17 @@ static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) IIRC there's an early return here if the class doesn't have uclamp support, which I think is wrong now. You want the reset irrespective of whether the class supports it, no? > > for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) > p->uclamp[clamp_id].active = false; > + > + if (likely(!reset)) > + return; > + > + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) { > + unsigned int clamp_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id); > + > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].user_defined = false; > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].value = clamp_value; > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id = uclamp_bucket_id(clamp_value); > + } > }
On 13-Mar 21:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:45AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > > index 070caa1f72eb..8b282616e9c9 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct task_struct *p, > > } > > } > > > > -static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) > > +static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p, bool reset) > > { > > unsigned int clamp_id; > > > > @@ -1080,6 +1080,17 @@ static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) > > IIRC there's an early return here if the class doesn't have uclamp > support, which I think is wrong now. You want the reset irrespective of > whether the class supports it, no? Yep, actually... since in this method we are always and only resetting certain values, it's probably better to just remove the check on class support and unconditionally do the required ones. > > for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) > > p->uclamp[clamp_id].active = false; > > + > > + if (likely(!reset)) > > + return; > > + > > + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) { > > + unsigned int clamp_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id); > > + > > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].user_defined = false; > > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].value = clamp_value; > > + p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id = uclamp_bucket_id(clamp_value); > > + } > > } > >
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 070caa1f72eb..8b282616e9c9 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct task_struct *p, } } -static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) +static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p, bool reset) { unsigned int clamp_id; @@ -1080,6 +1080,17 @@ static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) p->uclamp[clamp_id].active = false; + + if (likely(!reset)) + return; + + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) { + unsigned int clamp_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id); + + p->uclamp[clamp_id].user_defined = false; + p->uclamp[clamp_id].value = clamp_value; + p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id = uclamp_bucket_id(clamp_value); + } } static void __init init_uclamp(void) @@ -1124,7 +1135,7 @@ static inline int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p, } static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) { } -static inline void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) { } +static inline void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p, bool reset) { } static inline void init_uclamp(void) { } #endif /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ @@ -2711,6 +2722,7 @@ static inline void init_schedstats(void) {} int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) { unsigned long flags; + bool reset; __sched_fork(clone_flags, p); /* @@ -2728,7 +2740,8 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) /* * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested. */ - if (unlikely(p->sched_reset_on_fork)) { + reset = p->sched_reset_on_fork; + if (unlikely(reset)) { if (task_has_dl_policy(p) || task_has_rt_policy(p)) { p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL; p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(0); @@ -2755,7 +2768,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se); - uclamp_fork(p); + uclamp_fork(p, reset); /* * The child is not yet in the pid-hash so no cgroup attach races,
A forked tasks gets the same clamp values of its parent however, when the RESET_ON_FORK flag is set on parent, e.g. via: sys_sched_setattr() sched_setattr() __sched_setscheduler(attr::SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK) the new forked task is expected to start with all attributes reset to default values. Do that for utilization clamp values too by caching the reset request and propagating it into the existing uclamp_fork() call which already provides the required initialization for other uclamp related bits. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)