| Message ID | 20190227021841.GA26337@centauri.lan (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | broken probe deferred for power-domains | expand |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:18 PM Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hello Rob, > > Your patch e01afc325025 ("PM / Domains: Stop deferring probe > at the end of initcall") breaks deferred probe for power domains. With all the dependencies built-in, right? What board in case I have one? > The patch looks like this: > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock); > dev_dbg(dev, "%s() failed to find PM domain: %ld\n", > __func__, PTR_ERR(pd)); > - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(dev); > } > > > Having two drivers (both using module_platform_driver), > one being a PD provider and one being a PD consumer. > > Before your patch: > The PD consumer driver calls dev_pm_domain_attach(), > and gets EPROBE_DEFER until the PD provider driver > has been probed successfully. > > (The PD provider driver needs some regulators, so it > is only successfully probed after the regulator driver > has been probed successfully.) > > Anyway, dev_pm_domain_attach() returned success after > the some deferred probes. > > > After your patch: > dev_pm_domain_attach() return ENODEV, > which comes from driver_deferred_probe_check_state(). > Since it returns ENODEV rather than EPROBE_DEFER, > the PD consumer driver fails to probe. > > > The problem is related to your other patch 25b4e70dcce9 > ("driver core: allow stopping deferred probe after init"). > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() returns ENODEV if > initcalls_done == true. > > initcalls_done is set from late_initcall(deferred_probe_initcall), > in drivers/base/dd.c: > driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); > flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); > initcalls_done = true; > > This does not seem very robust, since > > #1 It does not handle the case where two drivers have been > deferred (put in the deferred probe pending list), > where additionally one of the drivers has to be probed > before the other. > > (We would need to call driver_deferred_probe_trigger() + flush_work() > at least twice to handle this.) > > #2 Since this code is run from late_initcall(), > initcalls_done might get set before other drivers using late_initcall() > have even had a chance to run. IMO, we should not have drivers using late_initcall. We need some level just to do things at the end of boot. The same fragility exists with the clock and regulator disabling. > I can imagine that a driver using late_initcall() + EPROBE_DEFER > will absolutely not work with this code. > > > This patch fixes #1, but not #2. > However, I assume that even this change would not work if we have 3 > drivers, where each driver a > b > c has to be probed, in that order. > (and all of them were placed in the deferred probe pending list). I thought a successful probe would trigger a retry too. I need to look at it again. Maybe it would be more robust to re-trigger probe until the pending list doesn't change. Then we could handle any length of dependencies. > > Suggestions and patches are welcome. > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c > index a823f469e53f..3443cb78be9b 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c > @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void) > driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); > /* Sort as many dependencies as possible before exiting initcalls */ > flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); > - initcalls_done = true; > > /* > * Trigger deferred probe again, this time we won't defer anything > @@ -297,6 +296,8 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void) > driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); > flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); > > + initcalls_done = true; > + > if (deferred_probe_timeout > 0) { > schedule_delayed_work(&deferred_probe_timeout_work, > deferred_probe_timeout * HZ); > > > > Kind regards, > Niklas
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:32:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:18 PM Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Hello Rob, > > > > Your patch e01afc325025 ("PM / Domains: Stop deferring probe > > at the end of initcall") breaks deferred probe for power domains. > > With all the dependencies built-in, right? Yep > > What board in case I have one? You probably do :) Dragonboard 410c. It is reproducible very easily with branch: initcalls-for-robh from this git: https://git.linaro.org/people/niklas.cassel/kernel.git ARCH=arm64 make defconfig I recommend you to use trace_printk() when debugging drivers/base/dd.c, since I've seen that printk can affect the timing so much that the issue goes away :) (So don't forget to enable CONFIG_FTRACE). > > > The patch looks like this: > > > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, > > mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock); > > dev_dbg(dev, "%s() failed to find PM domain: %ld\n", > > __func__, PTR_ERR(pd)); > > - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(dev); > > } > > > > > > Having two drivers (both using module_platform_driver), > > one being a PD provider and one being a PD consumer. > > > > Before your patch: > > The PD consumer driver calls dev_pm_domain_attach(), > > and gets EPROBE_DEFER until the PD provider driver > > has been probed successfully. > > > > (The PD provider driver needs some regulators, so it > > is only successfully probed after the regulator driver > > has been probed successfully.) > > > > Anyway, dev_pm_domain_attach() returned success after > > the some deferred probes. > > > > > > After your patch: > > dev_pm_domain_attach() return ENODEV, > > which comes from driver_deferred_probe_check_state(). > > Since it returns ENODEV rather than EPROBE_DEFER, > > the PD consumer driver fails to probe. > > > > > > The problem is related to your other patch 25b4e70dcce9 > > ("driver core: allow stopping deferred probe after init"). > > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() returns ENODEV if > > initcalls_done == true. > > > > initcalls_done is set from late_initcall(deferred_probe_initcall), > > in drivers/base/dd.c: > > driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); > > flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); > > initcalls_done = true; > > > > This does not seem very robust, since > > > > #1 It does not handle the case where two drivers have been > > deferred (put in the deferred probe pending list), > > where additionally one of the drivers has to be probed > > before the other. > > > > (We would need to call driver_deferred_probe_trigger() + flush_work() > > at least twice to handle this.) > > > > #2 Since this code is run from late_initcall(), > > initcalls_done might get set before other drivers using late_initcall() > > have even had a chance to run. > > IMO, we should not have drivers using late_initcall. We need some > level just to do things at the end of boot. The same fragility exists > with the clock and regulator disabling. > > > I can imagine that a driver using late_initcall() + EPROBE_DEFER > > will absolutely not work with this code. > > > > > > This patch fixes #1, but not #2. > > However, I assume that even this change would not work if we have 3 > > drivers, where each driver a > b > c has to be probed, in that order. > > (and all of them were placed in the deferred probe pending list). > > I thought a successful probe would trigger a retry too. I need to look > at it again. That is true, a successful probe does trigger a retry, driver_bound() has a call to driver_deferred_probe_trigger(), which calls schedule_work(&deferred_probe_work). I guess what is missing is a call to flush_work(&deferred_probe_work) after the work has been scheduled. But since the flush_work() waits, I guess the additional flush_work() has to be in deferred_probe_initcall(), and not in driver_bound(). Kind regards, Niklas > > Maybe it would be more robust to re-trigger probe until the pending > list doesn't change. Then we could handle any length of dependencies. > > > > > Suggestions and patches are welcome. > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c > > index a823f469e53f..3443cb78be9b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c > > @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void) > > driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); > > /* Sort as many dependencies as possible before exiting initcalls */ > > flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); > > - initcalls_done = true; > > > > /* > > * Trigger deferred probe again, this time we won't defer anything > > @@ -297,6 +296,8 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void) > > driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); > > flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); > > > > + initcalls_done = true; > > + > > if (deferred_probe_timeout > 0) { > > schedule_delayed_work(&deferred_probe_timeout_work, > > deferred_probe_timeout * HZ); > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > Niklas
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c index a823f469e53f..3443cb78be9b 100644 --- a/drivers/base/dd.c +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void) driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); /* Sort as many dependencies as possible before exiting initcalls */ flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); - initcalls_done = true; /* * Trigger deferred probe again, this time we won't defer anything @@ -297,6 +296,8 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void) driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); + initcalls_done = true; + if (deferred_probe_timeout > 0) { schedule_delayed_work(&deferred_probe_timeout_work, deferred_probe_timeout * HZ);
Hello Rob, Your patch e01afc325025 ("PM / Domains: Stop deferring probe at the end of initcall") breaks deferred probe for power domains. The patch looks like this: +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock); dev_dbg(dev, "%s() failed to find PM domain: %ld\n", __func__, PTR_ERR(pd)); - return -EPROBE_DEFER; + return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(dev); } Having two drivers (both using module_platform_driver), one being a PD provider and one being a PD consumer. Before your patch: The PD consumer driver calls dev_pm_domain_attach(), and gets EPROBE_DEFER until the PD provider driver has been probed successfully. (The PD provider driver needs some regulators, so it is only successfully probed after the regulator driver has been probed successfully.) Anyway, dev_pm_domain_attach() returned success after the some deferred probes. After your patch: dev_pm_domain_attach() return ENODEV, which comes from driver_deferred_probe_check_state(). Since it returns ENODEV rather than EPROBE_DEFER, the PD consumer driver fails to probe. The problem is related to your other patch 25b4e70dcce9 ("driver core: allow stopping deferred probe after init"). driver_deferred_probe_check_state() returns ENODEV if initcalls_done == true. initcalls_done is set from late_initcall(deferred_probe_initcall), in drivers/base/dd.c: driver_deferred_probe_trigger(); flush_work(&deferred_probe_work); initcalls_done = true; This does not seem very robust, since #1 It does not handle the case where two drivers have been deferred (put in the deferred probe pending list), where additionally one of the drivers has to be probed before the other. (We would need to call driver_deferred_probe_trigger() + flush_work() at least twice to handle this.) #2 Since this code is run from late_initcall(), initcalls_done might get set before other drivers using late_initcall() have even had a chance to run. I can imagine that a driver using late_initcall() + EPROBE_DEFER will absolutely not work with this code. This patch fixes #1, but not #2. However, I assume that even this change would not work if we have 3 drivers, where each driver a > b > c has to be probed, in that order. (and all of them were placed in the deferred probe pending list). Suggestions and patches are welcome. Kind regards, Niklas