@@ -201,8 +201,10 @@ unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
unsigned long dl_util, util, irq;
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
+ if (!IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK) &&
+ type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt)) {
return max;
+ }
/*
* Early check to see if IRQ/steal time saturates the CPU, can be
@@ -218,9 +220,16 @@ unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
* CFS tasks and we use the same metric to track the effective
* utilization (PELT windows are synchronized) we can directly add them
* to obtain the CPU's actual utilization.
+ *
+ * CFS and RT utilization can be boosted or capped, depending on
+ * utilization clamp constraints requested by currently RUNNABLE
+ * tasks.
+ * When there are no CFS RUNNABLE tasks, clamps are released and
+ * frequency will be gracefully reduced with the utilization decay.
*/
- util = util_cfs;
- util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
+ util = util_cfs + cpu_util_rt(rq);
+ if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL)
+ util = uclamp_util(rq, util);
dl_util = cpu_util_dl(rq);
@@ -10617,6 +10617,10 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
.task_change_group = task_change_group_fair,
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
+ .uclamp_enabled = 1,
+#endif
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
@@ -2400,6 +2400,10 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.switched_to = switched_to_rt,
.update_curr = update_curr_rt,
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
+ .uclamp_enabled = 1,
+#endif
};
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -2275,6 +2275,29 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags)
static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+{
+ unsigned int min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
+ unsigned int max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
+
+ /*
+ * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering
+ * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an
+ * inversion. Fix it now when the clamps are applied.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(min_util >= max_util))
+ return min_util;
+
+ return clamp(util, min_util, max_util);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+{
+ return util;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
+
#ifdef arch_scale_freq_capacity
# ifndef arch_scale_freq_invariant
# define arch_scale_freq_invariant() true
Each time a frequency update is required via schedutil, a frequency is selected to (possibly) satisfy the utilization reported by each scheduling class and irqs. However, when utilization clamping is in use, the frequency selection should consider userspace utilization clamping hints. This will allow, for example, to: - boost tasks which are directly affecting the user experience by running them at least at a minimum "requested" frequency - cap low priority tasks not directly affecting the user experience by running them only up to a maximum "allowed" frequency These constraints are meant to support a per-task based tuning of the frequency selection thus supporting a fine grained definition of performance boosting vs energy saving strategies in kernel space. Add support to clamp the utilization of RUNNABLE FAIR and RT tasks within the boundaries defined by their aggregated utilization clamp constraints. Do that by considering the max(min_util, max_util) to give boosted tasks the performance they need even when they happen to be co-scheduled with other capped tasks. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++++ kernel/sched/rt.c | 4 ++++ kernel/sched/sched.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)