From patchwork Fri May 3 09:44:08 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Quentin Perret X-Patchwork-Id: 10928173 X-Patchwork-Delegate: eduardo.valentin@ti.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85C41395 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9900284C4 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id AD645284C9; Fri, 3 May 2019 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3F1284C8 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727221AbfECJoo (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 05:44:44 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57390 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726047AbfECJon (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 05:44:43 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA2415AD; Fri, 3 May 2019 02:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com (queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.48]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 654F03F557; Fri, 3 May 2019 02:44:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Quentin Perret To: edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, javi.merino@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, quentin.perret@arm.com, mka@chromium.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] PM / EM: Expose perf domain struct Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 10:44:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20190503094409.3499-3-quentin.perret@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190503094409.3499-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20190503094409.3499-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP In the current state, the perf_domain struct is fully defined only when CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=y. Since we need to write code that compiles both with or without that option in the thermal framework, make sure to actually define the struct regardless of the config option. That allows to avoid using stubbed accessor functions all the time in code paths that use the EM. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h index aa027f7bcb3e..fb32b86a467d 100644 --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ #include #include -#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL /** * em_cap_state - Capacity state of a performance domain * @frequency: The CPU frequency in KHz, for consistency with CPUFreq @@ -40,6 +39,7 @@ struct em_perf_domain { unsigned long cpus[0]; }; +#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL #define EM_CPU_MAX_POWER 0xFFFF struct em_data_callback { @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) } #else -struct em_perf_domain {}; struct em_data_callback {}; #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { }