From patchwork Thu Jun 27 17:15:59 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Douglas RAILLARD X-Patchwork-Id: 11020115 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AA14C0 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA45F2848B for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BE59828505; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:16:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6CD2848B for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726562AbfF0RQV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:16:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59210 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726480AbfF0RQU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:16:20 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68290D6E; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107049-lin.arm.com (e107049-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 12E4A3F718; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Douglas RAILLARD To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, quentin.perret@arm.com, douglas.raillard@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq() Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:15:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20190627171603.14767-2-douglas.raillard@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190627171603.14767-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> References: <20190627171603.14767-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP em_pd_get_higher_freq() returns a frequency greater or equal to the provided one while taking into account a given cost margin. It also skips inefficient OPPs that have a higher cost than another one with a higher frequency. The efficiency of an OPP is measured as efficiency=capacity/power. OPPs with the same efficiency are assumed to be equivalent, since they will consume as much energy for a given amount of work to do. That may take more or less time depending on the frequency, but will consume the same energy. Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h index aa027f7bcb3e..cc9819967f8d 100644 --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -159,6 +159,53 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) return pd->nr_cap_states; } +#define EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE 1024U + +/** + * em_pd_get_higher_freq() - Get the highest frequency that does not exceed the + * given cost margin compared to min_freq + * @pd : performance domain for which this must be done + * @min_freq : minimum frequency to return + * @cost_margin : allowed margin compared to min_freq, on the + * EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE scale. + * + * Return: the chosen frequency, guaranteed to be at least as high as min_freq. + */ +static inline unsigned long em_pd_get_higher_freq(struct em_perf_domain *pd, + unsigned long min_freq, unsigned long cost_margin) +{ + unsigned long max_cost = 0; + struct em_cap_state *cs; + int i; + + if (!pd) + return min_freq; + + /* Compute the maximum allowed cost */ + for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_cap_states; i++) { + cs = &pd->table[i]; + if (cs->frequency >= min_freq) { + max_cost = cs->cost + + (cs->cost * cost_margin) / EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE; + break; + } + } + + /* Find the highest frequency that will not exceed the cost margin */ + for (i = pd->nr_cap_states-1; i >= 0; i--) { + cs = &pd->table[i]; + if (cs->cost <= max_cost) + return cs->frequency; + } + + /* + * We should normally never reach here, unless min_freq was higher than + * the highest available frequency, which is not expected to happen. + */ + return min_freq; +} + + #else struct em_perf_domain {}; struct em_data_callback {}; @@ -182,6 +229,12 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) { return 0; } + +static inline unsigned long em_pd_get_higher_freq(struct em_perf_domain *pd, + unsigned long min_freq, unsigned long cost_margin) +{ + return min_freq; +} #endif #endif