Message ID | 20200320113233.10219-1-patrice.chotard@st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | PM / wakeup: Add dev_wakeup_path() helper | expand |
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 12:32, <patrice.chotard@st.com> wrote: > > From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > > Add dev_wakeup_path() helper to avoid to spread > dev->power.wakeup_path test in drivers. I am okay adding a helper, but would appreciate if you send a series to convert those using the flag currently. > > In case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, wakeup_path is not defined, > dev_wakeup_path() is returning false. > > Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > --- > > Currently, in mainline kernel, no drivers are testing dev->power.wakeup_path > for PM purpose. A stm32 serial driver patch will be submitted soon and will > make usage of this helper. > > include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h > index aa3da6611533..d0bd13c19253 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h > @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(struct device *dev) > return dev->power.can_wakeup && !!dev->power.wakeup; > } > > +static inline bool device_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) > +{ > + return !!dev->power.wakeup_path; Why using "!!" here? > +} > + > static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) > { > dev->power.wakeup_path = true; > @@ -174,6 +179,11 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(struct device *dev) > return dev->power.can_wakeup && dev->power.should_wakeup; > } > > +static inline bool device_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) > +{ > + return false; > +} > + > static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) {} > > static inline void __pm_stay_awake(struct wakeup_source *ws) {} > -- > 2.17.1 > Kind regards Uffe
Hi Ulf On 3/20/20 12:55 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 12:32, <patrice.chotard@st.com> wrote: >> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> >> >> Add dev_wakeup_path() helper to avoid to spread >> dev->power.wakeup_path test in drivers. > I am okay adding a helper, but would appreciate if you send a series > to convert those using the flag currently. Ok, we wanted to be sure that this helper will be accepted before updating our driver with it. A new series will be sent including this patch and driver using it. > >> In case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, wakeup_path is not defined, >> dev_wakeup_path() is returning false. >> >> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> >> --- >> >> Currently, in mainline kernel, no drivers are testing dev->power.wakeup_path >> for PM purpose. A stm32 serial driver patch will be submitted soon and will >> make usage of this helper. >> >> include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h >> index aa3da6611533..d0bd13c19253 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h >> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(struct device *dev) >> return dev->power.can_wakeup && !!dev->power.wakeup; >> } >> >> +static inline bool device_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + return !!dev->power.wakeup_path; > Why using "!!" here? right, not needed, wakeup_path is already a boolean.... Thanks Patrice > >> +} >> + >> static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) >> { >> dev->power.wakeup_path = true; >> @@ -174,6 +179,11 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(struct device *dev) >> return dev->power.can_wakeup && dev->power.should_wakeup; >> } >> >> +static inline bool device_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) {} >> >> static inline void __pm_stay_awake(struct wakeup_source *ws) {} >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> > Kind regards > Uffe
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h index aa3da6611533..d0bd13c19253 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(struct device *dev) return dev->power.can_wakeup && !!dev->power.wakeup; } +static inline bool device_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) +{ + return !!dev->power.wakeup_path; +} + static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) { dev->power.wakeup_path = true; @@ -174,6 +179,11 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(struct device *dev) return dev->power.can_wakeup && dev->power.should_wakeup; } +static inline bool device_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) +{ + return false; +} + static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev) {} static inline void __pm_stay_awake(struct wakeup_source *ws) {}