From patchwork Tue Sep 1 20:55:45 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ionela Voinescu X-Patchwork-Id: 11749475 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DCA138A for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671002078B for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728029AbgIAU4z (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:56:55 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:50364 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727035AbgIAU4t (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:56:49 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FB1113E; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.199.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D1F7C3F66F; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:56:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Ionela Voinescu To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] arch_topology: validate input frequencies to arch_set_freq_scale() Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:55:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20200901205549.30096-2-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200901205549.30096-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> References: <20200901205549.30096-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org The current frequency passed to arch_set_freq_scale() could end up being 0, signaling an error in setting a new frequency. Also, if the maximum frequency in 0, this will result in a division by 0 error. Therefore, validate these input values before using them for the setting of the frequency scale factor. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sudeep Holla Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c index 75f72d684294..42a08ef693ae 100644 --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, unsigned long scale; int i; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cur_freq || !max_freq)) + return; + /* * If the use of counters for FIE is enabled, just return as we don't * want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ.