Message ID | 20221111032515.3460-6-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | interconnect: osm-l3: SC8280XP L3 and DDR scaling | expand |
On 11/11/2022 04:25, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also > introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> > Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> > --- Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On 11/11/22 08:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also > introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> > Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> > --- > > Changes since v1: > - Fixed oneOf to be valid schema > - Fixed example to follow schema > > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > index bf538c0c5a81..aadae4424ba9 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > @@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description: > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 > - - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 > - - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 > - - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 > - - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 > - - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 > + - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 > + - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 > + - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 > + - const: qcom,osm-l3 > + - items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 > + - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3 > + - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > + - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3 > + - const: qcom,epss-l3 isn't it incorrect to describe qcom,epss-l3 as a working backup compatible for sc7280-epss-l3 and sm8250-epss-l3? Shouldn't we just add another items list with those 2 as enums? > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > @@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ examples: > #define RPMH_CXO_CLK 0 > > osm_l3: interconnect@17d41000 { > - compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3"; > + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", "qcom,osm-l3"; > reg = <0x17d41000 0x1400>; > > clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 04:02:42PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > > > On 11/11/22 08:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also > > introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> > > Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> > > --- > > > > Changes since v1: > > - Fixed oneOf to be valid schema > > - Fixed example to follow schema > > > > .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > > index bf538c0c5a81..aadae4424ba9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml > > @@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description: > > properties: > > compatible: > > - enum: > > - - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 > > - - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 > > - - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > > + oneOf: > > + - items: > > + - enum: > > + - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 > > + - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 > > + - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 > > + - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 > > + - const: qcom,osm-l3 > > + - items: > > + - enum: > > + - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 > > + - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3 > > + - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 > > + - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3 > > + - const: qcom,epss-l3 > > isn't it incorrect to describe qcom,epss-l3 as a working > backup compatible for sc7280-epss-l3 and sm8250-epss-l3? > Shouldn't we just add another items list with those 2 as > enums? > I was about to agree, but the difference between the two sets are which registers we use to request the speed. And per our recent discussion, I was under the impression that this would be a property of BIT(0) in 0xb0 being set, not which platform we're running on. If that's the case then they are indeed compatible and we should adjust .ref_perf_state based on per-core DCVS being set or not. So I do think this description is appropriate... Regards, Bjorn > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ examples: > > #define RPMH_CXO_CLK 0 > > osm_l3: interconnect@17d41000 { > > - compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3"; > > + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", "qcom,osm-l3"; > > reg = <0x17d41000 0x1400>; > > clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;
On 11/11/22 23:38, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 04:02:42PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: >> >> >> On 11/11/22 08:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> Add EPSS L3 compatibles for sm8350 and sc8280xp, but while at it also >>> introduce generic compatible for both qcom,osm-l3 and qcom,epss-l3. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> >>> Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - Fixed oneOf to be valid schema >>> - Fixed example to follow schema >>> >>> .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml >>> index bf538c0c5a81..aadae4424ba9 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml >>> @@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description: >>> properties: >>> compatible: >>> - enum: >>> - - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 >>> - - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 >>> - - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 >>> - - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 >>> - - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 >>> - - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 >>> + oneOf: >>> + - items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 >>> + - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 >>> + - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 >>> + - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 >>> + - const: qcom,osm-l3 >>> + - items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 >>> + - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3 >>> + - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 >>> + - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3 >>> + - const: qcom,epss-l3 >> >> isn't it incorrect to describe qcom,epss-l3 as a working >> backup compatible for sc7280-epss-l3 and sm8250-epss-l3? >> Shouldn't we just add another items list with those 2 as >> enums? >> > > I was about to agree, but the difference between the two sets are which > registers we use to request the speed. > > And per our recent discussion, I was under the impression that this > would be a property of BIT(0) in 0xb0 being set, not which platform > we're running on. > > If that's the case then they are indeed compatible and we should adjust > .ref_perf_state based on per-core DCVS being set or not. > > > So I do think this description is appropriate... Reviewed-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com> > > Regards, > Bjorn > >>> reg: >>> maxItems: 1 >>> @@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ examples: >>> #define RPMH_CXO_CLK 0 >>> osm_l3: interconnect@17d41000 { >>> - compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3"; >>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", "qcom,osm-l3"; >>> reg = <0x17d41000 0x1400>; >>> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml index bf538c0c5a81..aadae4424ba9 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml @@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ description: properties: compatible: - enum: - - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 - - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 - - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 - - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 - - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 - - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 + oneOf: + - items: + - enum: + - qcom,sc7180-osm-l3 + - qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3 + - qcom,sdm845-osm-l3 + - qcom,sm8150-osm-l3 + - const: qcom,osm-l3 + - items: + - enum: + - qcom,sc7280-epss-l3 + - qcom,sc8280xp-epss-l3 + - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3 + - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3 + - const: qcom,epss-l3 reg: maxItems: 1 @@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ examples: #define RPMH_CXO_CLK 0 osm_l3: interconnect@17d41000 { - compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3"; + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", "qcom,osm-l3"; reg = <0x17d41000 0x1400>; clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;