@@ -243,12 +243,19 @@ em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table)
struct em_perf_domain *pd = dev->em_pd;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
int found = 0;
- int i;
+ int i, cpu;
if (!_is_cpu_device(dev) || !pd)
return;
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpumask_first(em_span_cpus(pd)));
+ /* Try to get a CPU which is online and in this PD */
+ cpu = cpumask_first_and(em_span_cpus(pd), cpu_active_mask);
+ if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "EM: No online CPU for CPUFreq policy\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (!policy) {
dev_warn(dev, "EM: Access to CPUFreq policy failed");
return;
The Energy Model might be updated at runtime and the energy efficiency for each OPP may change. Thus, there is a need to update also the cpufreq framework and make it aligned to the new values. In order to do that, use a first online CPU from the Performance Domain. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> --- kernel/power/energy_model.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)