diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,13/35] ACPI: Rename acpi_scan_device_not_present() to be about enumeration

Message ID 20230913163823.7880-14-james.morse@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere, archived
Headers show
Series ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug | expand

Commit Message

James Morse Sept. 13, 2023, 4:38 p.m. UTC
acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
was only based on whether the device was present.

To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().

No change in behaviour is intended.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Gavin Shan Sept. 18, 2023, 4:13 a.m. UTC | #1
On 9/14/23 02:38, James Morse wrote:
> acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
> hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
> was only based on whether the device was present.
> 
> To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
> and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
> enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().
> 
> No change in behaviour is intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index ed01e19514ef..17ab875a7d4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int acpi_scan_device_not_present(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +static int acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(struct acpi_device *adev)
>   {
>   	if (!acpi_device_enumerated(adev)) {
> -		dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Still not present\n");
> +		dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Still not enumerated\n");
>   		return -EALREADY;
>   	}
>   	acpi_bus_trim(adev);
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev)
>   			error = -ENODEV;
>   		}
>   	} else {
> -		error = acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
> +		error = acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
>   	}
>   	return error;
>   }
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
>   
>   	acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
>   	if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> -		acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
> +		acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   	if (handler && handler->hotplug.scan_dependent)

Thanks,
Gavin
Russell King (Oracle) Oct. 20, 2023, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:38:01PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
> hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
> was only based on whether the device was present.
> 
> To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
> and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
> enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().
> 
> No change in behaviour is intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

Is this another patch which ought to be submitted without waiting
for the rest of the series?

Thanks.
Jonathan Cameron Oct. 20, 2023, 4:41 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:01:30 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:38:01PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> > acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
> > hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
> > was only based on whether the device was present.
> > 
> > To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
> > and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
> > enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().
> > 
> > No change in behaviour is intended.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>  
> 
> Is this another patch which ought to be submitted without waiting
> for the rest of the series?
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Looks like a valid standalone change to me.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index ed01e19514ef..17ab875a7d4e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -289,10 +289,10 @@  static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int acpi_scan_device_not_present(struct acpi_device *adev)
+static int acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
 	if (!acpi_device_enumerated(adev)) {
-		dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Still not present\n");
+		dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Still not enumerated\n");
 		return -EALREADY;
 	}
 	acpi_bus_trim(adev);
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@  static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev)
 			error = -ENODEV;
 		}
 	} else {
-		error = acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
+		error = acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
 	}
 	return error;
 }
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@  static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
 
 	acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
 	if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
-		acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
+		acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	if (handler && handler->hotplug.scan_dependent)