From patchwork Thu Apr 18 13:54:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 13634812 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DCE160796; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713448672; cv=none; b=rsfTsC5FUcskQhOiqUPdXt1YraFxyfm7i/vqCsAyIjzpVIRSjsDJ10ZW+JRQfieK83HPtFiLZ+39m3sbw8G49k0k5IV3Zb5C+11J1PfQPb5z4ZBDqSUtT7hZ9xelQIUNosktqNDK96qsbpWoaip1tOKOgR+UYK2wo5A23vJegvQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713448672; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Fg1Uw/EE5fB2oyPrQhHIjgnrktVY0yIzZa7BULUrzRw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WZL9nhYHlswaIJUVI5zMqZ3vbCnkL4pG5Hp9Yr0DuCitZ16eR/MzTHfAfzemKYK7ZiHHiDqFMt5CeT6EqztMAjci2ApVuQ/aXaD9Tv2gZHimmf2PzTX9cS79VoQx54HCcHTCv/ryZJ2oT/X9KeAADH+OEmFH2c8U6UNUHIkyWfw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKznZ1rkyz6D955; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:55:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147261406AC; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:57:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:57:48 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v7 07/16] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for acpi_scan_check_and_detach() Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20240418135412.14730-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240418135412.14730-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240418135412.14730-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a uintptr_t of flags into acpi_scan_check_and detach() so that additional flags can be added to indicate whether to defer portions of the eject flow. The new flag follows in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan --- v7: No change v6: Based on internal feedback switch to less invasive change to using flags rather than a struct. --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index d1464324de95..1ec9677e6c2d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -244,13 +244,16 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device) return 0; } -static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check) +#define ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS BIT(0) + +static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) { struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler; + uintptr_t flags = (uintptr_t)p; - acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, check); + acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, p); - if (check) { + if (flags & ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS) { acpi_bus_get_status(adev); /* * Skip devices that are still there and take the enabled @@ -288,7 +291,9 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check) static void acpi_scan_check_subtree(struct acpi_device *adev) { - acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)true); + uintptr_t flags = ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS; + + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)flags); } static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) @@ -2601,7 +2606,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan); */ void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev) { - acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, NULL); + uintptr_t flags = 0; + + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);