| Message ID | 20240430142434.10471-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug | expand |
On 5/1/24 00:24, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Rafael observed [1] that returning 0 from processor_add() will result in > acpi_default_enumeration() being called which will attempt to create a > platform device, but that makes little sense when the processor is known > to be not available. So just return the error code from acpi_processor_get_info() > instead. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0iKU8ra9jR+EmgxbuNm=Uwx2m1-8vn_RAZ+aCiUVLe3Pw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] > Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > --- > v9: New patch following through from Gavin pointing out a memory leak later > in the series. > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:26 PM Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote: > > Rafael observed [1] that returning 0 from processor_add() will result in > acpi_default_enumeration() being called which will attempt to create a > platform device, but that makes little sense when the processor is known > to be not available. So just return the error code from acpi_processor_get_info() > instead. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0iKU8ra9jR+EmgxbuNm=Uwx2m1-8vn_RAZ+aCiUVLe3Pw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] > Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Thank you! > --- > v9: New patch following through from Gavin pointing out a memory leak later > in the series. > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > index 161c95c9d60a..5f062806ca40 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, > > result = acpi_processor_get_info(device); > if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ > - return 0; > + return result; > > BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); > > -- > 2.39.2 >
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 161c95c9d60a..5f062806ca40 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, result = acpi_processor_get_info(device); if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ - return 0; + return result; BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
Rafael observed [1] that returning 0 from processor_add() will result in acpi_default_enumeration() being called which will attempt to create a platform device, but that makes little sense when the processor is known to be not available. So just return the error code from acpi_processor_get_info() instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0iKU8ra9jR+EmgxbuNm=Uwx2m1-8vn_RAZ+aCiUVLe3Pw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> --- v9: New patch following through from Gavin pointing out a memory leak later in the series. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)