From patchwork Tue Apr 30 14:24:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 13649399 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE191527B9; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714487202; cv=none; b=SVJX7BslTloeFAaMHZyzsGYW4PKpkWiPgM1J6wBo8M8pOalDCwXzl772LiTUgRZN4lUtrosuoON+tjcTWYE0yt5uqp2/M5gZDotYkmfYXZWwaGcEPH4VFgptW37jE3PPtM+2z/JHmn4znyAj5wLlhimN8DRTitISSNCjLQbWFmc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714487202; c=relaxed/simple; bh=++tTBu/3iosilBm8q623VgJey1KjvjPLHE3HQskF/j4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UE1XS1vIa6VQXAg8Pmlcm9wPbDpZBlwwnF6mzV2NwmNgbLhGix2z8abDQqGU+JPcasJBT52wXEgepTrTbL8iUBISd4PQoacdFrdgr1ezpuK6A1kONIr2l1o+UpTenDs7XLqIjg3JVhG7s4tGnjPRr2MPV+UWvYalg5HWrhSI8os= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VTMvK1bnTz6DB5S; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:26:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47CF4140A08; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:26:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:26:38 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Hanjun Guo , Gavin Shan CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v9 04/19] ACPI: processor: Return an error if acpi_processor_get_info() fails in processor_add() Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20240430142434.10471-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240430142434.10471-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240430142434.10471-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Rafael observed [1] that returning 0 from processor_add() will result in acpi_default_enumeration() being called which will attempt to create a platform device, but that makes little sense when the processor is known to be not available. So just return the error code from acpi_processor_get_info() instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0iKU8ra9jR+EmgxbuNm=Uwx2m1-8vn_RAZ+aCiUVLe3Pw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- v9: New patch following through from Gavin pointing out a memory leak later in the series. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 161c95c9d60a..5f062806ca40 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, result = acpi_processor_get_info(device); if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ - return 0; + return result; BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);