Message ID | 20240711102436.4432-10-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add per-core RAPL energy counter support for AMD CPUs | expand |
On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 10:24 +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote: > After making the rapl_model struct global, the rapl_msrs global > variable isn't needed, so remove it. > > Also it will be cleaner when new per-core scope PMU is added. As we > will > need to maintain two rapl_msrs array(one for per-core scope and one > for > package scope PMU), inside the rapl_model struct. > > Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> -rui > --- > arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c > index 9beded3d4a14..7691497042e9 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c > +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c > @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static int rapl_pkg_hw_unit[NR_RAPL_PKG_DOMAINS] > __read_mostly; > static struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus_pkg; > static unsigned int rapl_pkg_cntr_mask; > static u64 rapl_timer_ms; > -static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs; > static struct rapl_model *rapl_model; > > /* > @@ -387,7 +386,7 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event > *event) > return -EINVAL; > event->cpu = rapl_pmu->cpu; > event->pmu_private = rapl_pmu; > - event->hw.event_base = rapl_msrs[bit].msr; > + event->hw.event_base = rapl_model->rapl_msrs[bit].msr; > event->hw.config = cfg; > event->hw.idx = bit; > > @@ -875,9 +874,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) > > rapl_model = (struct rapl_model *) id->driver_data; > > - rapl_msrs = rapl_model->rapl_pkg_msrs; > - > - rapl_pkg_cntr_mask = perf_msr_probe(rapl_msrs, > PERF_RAPL_PKG_EVENTS_MAX, > + rapl_pkg_cntr_mask = perf_msr_probe(rapl_model->rapl_msrs, > PERF_RAPL_PKG_EVENTS_MAX, > false, (void *) &rapl_model- > >pkg_events); > > ret = rapl_check_hw_unit();
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c index 9beded3d4a14..7691497042e9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static int rapl_pkg_hw_unit[NR_RAPL_PKG_DOMAINS] __read_mostly; static struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus_pkg; static unsigned int rapl_pkg_cntr_mask; static u64 rapl_timer_ms; -static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs; static struct rapl_model *rapl_model; /* @@ -387,7 +386,7 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) return -EINVAL; event->cpu = rapl_pmu->cpu; event->pmu_private = rapl_pmu; - event->hw.event_base = rapl_msrs[bit].msr; + event->hw.event_base = rapl_model->rapl_msrs[bit].msr; event->hw.config = cfg; event->hw.idx = bit; @@ -875,9 +874,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) rapl_model = (struct rapl_model *) id->driver_data; - rapl_msrs = rapl_model->rapl_pkg_msrs; - - rapl_pkg_cntr_mask = perf_msr_probe(rapl_msrs, PERF_RAPL_PKG_EVENTS_MAX, + rapl_pkg_cntr_mask = perf_msr_probe(rapl_model->rapl_msrs, PERF_RAPL_PKG_EVENTS_MAX, false, (void *) &rapl_model->pkg_events); ret = rapl_check_hw_unit();
After making the rapl_model struct global, the rapl_msrs global variable isn't needed, so remove it. Also it will be cleaner when new per-core scope PMU is added. As we will need to maintain two rapl_msrs array(one for per-core scope and one for package scope PMU), inside the rapl_model struct. Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> --- arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)