| Message ID | 45c87bec3397fdd704376807f0eec5cc71be440f.1685692810.git.geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | iopoll: Busy loop and timeout improvements + conversions | expand |
diff --git a/include/linux/iopoll.h b/include/linux/iopoll.h index 2c8860e406bd8cae..0417360a6db9b0d6 100644 --- a/include/linux/iopoll.h +++ b/include/linux/iopoll.h @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ } \ if (__sleep_us) \ usleep_range((__sleep_us >> 2) + 1, __sleep_us); \ + cpu_relax(); \ } \ (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ }) @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ } \ if (__delay_us) \ udelay(__delay_us); \ + cpu_relax(); \ } \ (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ })
It is considered good practice to call cpu_relax() in busy loops, see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst. This can not only lower CPU power consumption or yield to a hyperthreaded twin processor, but also allows an architecture to mitigate hardware issues (e.g. ARM Erratum 754327 for Cortex-A9 prior to r2p0) in the architecture-specific cpu_relax() implementation. In addition, cpu_relax() is also a compiler barrier. It is not immediately obvious that the @op argument "function" will result in an actual function call (e.g. in case of inlining). Where a function call is a C sequence point, this is lost on inlining. Therefore, with agressive enough optimization it might be possible for the compiler to hoist the: (val) = op(args); "load" out of the loop because it doesn't see the value changing. The addition of cpu_relax() would inhibit this. As the iopoll helpers lack calls to cpu_relax(), people are sometimes reluctant to use them, and may fall back to open-coded polling loops (including cpu_relax() calls) instead. Fix this by adding calls to cpu_relax() to the iopoll helpers: - For the non-atomic case, it is sufficient to call cpu_relax() in case of a zero sleep-between-reads value, as a call to usleep_range() is a safe barrier otherwise. However, it doesn't hurt to add the call regardless, for simplicity, and for similarity with the atomic case below. - For the atomic case, cpu_relax() must be called regardless of the sleep-between-reads value, as there is no guarantee all architecture-specific implementations of udelay() handle this. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> --- v3: - Add Reviewed-by, v2: - Add Acked-by, - Add compiler barrier and inlining explanation (thanks, Peter!). --- include/linux/iopoll.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)