Message ID | 47594802e96dc2b1e727fd88f92b3fa4459b4d09.1438239727.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Zhang Rui |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index d010c6d0d722..276cec5a1fb7 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, if (policy->max != max_freq) cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); + break; } mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); break;
If a valid cpufreq_dev is found for policy->cpu, we should update the policy and quit the for loop. There is no need to keep traversing the list of cpufreq_dev's. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)