| Message ID | a23708f8ff62f55ef6b8e67792224655c39b9786.1500373914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index a4d9b47c4af4..c7ae67d6886d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2016,8 +2016,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) /* Platform doesn't want dynamic frequency switching ? */ if (policy->governor->dynamic_switching && - (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING || - policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency == CPUFREQ_ETERNAL)) { + cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING) { struct cpufreq_governor *gov = cpufreq_fallback_governor(); if (gov) {
With the recent updates, CPUFREQ_ETERNAL is only used by the drivers which don't know their transition latency but want to use dynamic switching. Anyway, the routine cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us() caps the value of transition latency to 10 ms now and that can be used safely with such platforms. Remove the check from cpufreq_init_governor() and allow dynamic switching for such configurations as well. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)