diff mbox

[v1,09/16] rtc: mediatek: convert to use device managed functions

Message ID fbfb1852838820c198d55bc74940a74f1d0b53ed.1521794177.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Sean Wang March 23, 2018, 9:15 a.m. UTC
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>

Use device managed operation to simplify error handling, reduce source
code size, and reduce the likelyhood of bugs, and remove our removal
callback which contains anything already done by device managed functions.

Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexandre Belloni March 23, 2018, 10:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On 23/03/2018 at 17:15:06 +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> 
> Use device managed operation to simplify error handling, reduce source
> code size, and reduce the likelyhood of bugs, and remove our removal
> callback which contains anything already done by device managed functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> index cefb83b..bfc5d6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/rtc.h>
> @@ -328,10 +329,10 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
>  
> -	ret = request_threaded_irq(rtc->irq, NULL,
> -				   mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> -				   IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> -				   "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
> +					mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> +					IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> +					"mt6397-rtc", rtc);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
>  			rtc->irq, ret);
> @@ -340,30 +341,15 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
>  
> -	rtc->rtc_dev = rtc_device_register("mt6397-rtc", &pdev->dev,
> -					   &mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> +	rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, "mt6397-rtc",
> +						&mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);

You should probably switch to devm_rtc_allocate_device() and
rtc_register_device instead of devm_rtc_device_register.

>  	if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register rtc device failed\n");
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> -		goto out_free_irq;
> +		return ret;

ret doesn't seem necessary anymore here.
Sean Wang March 26, 2018, 4:07 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 11:50 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 23/03/2018 at 17:15:06 +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Use device managed operation to simplify error handling, reduce source
> > code size, and reduce the likelyhood of bugs, and remove our removal
> > callback which contains anything already done by device managed functions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > index cefb83b..bfc5d6f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/rtc.h>
> > @@ -328,10 +329,10 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> >  
> > -	ret = request_threaded_irq(rtc->irq, NULL,
> > -				   mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> > -				   IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > -				   "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> > +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
> > +					mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> > +					IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > +					"mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> >  	if (ret) {
> >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
> >  			rtc->irq, ret);
> > @@ -340,30 +341,15 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> >  
> > -	rtc->rtc_dev = rtc_device_register("mt6397-rtc", &pdev->dev,
> > -					   &mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> > +	rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, "mt6397-rtc",
> > +						&mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> 
> You should probably switch to devm_rtc_allocate_device() and
> rtc_register_device instead of devm_rtc_device_register.
> 

Just would like to know something details

It seems you just encourage me to switch into the new registration
method and currently devm_rtc_device_register I used for the driver
shouldn't cause any harm. right?

> >  	if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)) {
> >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register rtc device failed\n");
> >  		ret = PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> > -		goto out_free_irq;
> > +		return ret;
> 
> ret doesn't seem necessary anymore here.


okay, it'll be removed

> 
>
Alexandre Belloni March 27, 2018, 3:07 p.m. UTC | #3
On 26/03/2018 at 12:07:45 +0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> > > -	rtc->rtc_dev = rtc_device_register("mt6397-rtc", &pdev->dev,
> > > -					   &mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> > > +	rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, "mt6397-rtc",
> > > +						&mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> > 
> > You should probably switch to devm_rtc_allocate_device() and
> > rtc_register_device instead of devm_rtc_device_register.
> > 
> 
> Just would like to know something details
> 
> It seems you just encourage me to switch into the new registration
> method and currently devm_rtc_device_register I used for the driver
> shouldn't cause any harm. right?
> 

It will work but it will have to be converted to rtc_register_device
later anyway.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
index cefb83b..bfc5d6f 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ 
 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 #include <linux/rtc.h>
@@ -328,10 +329,10 @@  static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
 
-	ret = request_threaded_irq(rtc->irq, NULL,
-				   mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
-				   IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
-				   "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
+					mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
+					IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
+					"mt6397-rtc", rtc);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
 			rtc->irq, ret);
@@ -340,30 +341,15 @@  static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
 
-	rtc->rtc_dev = rtc_device_register("mt6397-rtc", &pdev->dev,
-					   &mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
+	rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, "mt6397-rtc",
+						&mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
 	if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register rtc device failed\n");
 		ret = PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
-		goto out_free_irq;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-
-out_free_irq:
-	free_irq(rtc->irq, rtc->rtc_dev);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static int mtk_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	struct mt6397_rtc *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-
-	rtc_device_unregister(rtc->rtc_dev);
-	free_irq(rtc->irq, rtc->rtc_dev);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
@@ -405,7 +391,6 @@  static struct platform_driver mtk_rtc_driver = {
 		.pm = &mt6397_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe	= mtk_rtc_probe,
-	.remove = mtk_rtc_remove,
 };
 
 module_platform_driver(mtk_rtc_driver);